<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org">
<title>The European Journal of Orthodontics - current issue</title>
<link>http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org</link>
<description>The European Journal of Orthodontics - RSS feed of current issue</description>
<prism:eIssn>1460-2210</prism:eIssn>
<prism:coverDisplayDate>June 2009</prism:coverDisplayDate>
<prism:publicationName>The European Journal of Orthodontics</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>0141-5387</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/3/221?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/3/232?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/3/241?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/3/247?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/3/254?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/3/260?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/3/266?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/3/271?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/3/276?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/3/281?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/3/287?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/3/294?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/3/300?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/3/306?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/3/314?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/3/320?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/3/327?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/3/333?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/3/341?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/3/341-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/3/342?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/3/343?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
</channel>

<item rdf:about="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/3/221?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Induction of osteopenia during experimental tooth movement in the rat: alveolar bone remodelling and the mechanostat theory]]></title>
<link>http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/3/221?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Increases in bone strains above a certain threshold have a positive effect on bone mass, whereas reductions in strain magnitude lead to bone loss and osteopenia; the term &lsquo;mechanostat&rsquo; has been introduced to describe this tissue-level negative feedback mechanism. The mechanobiology of bone and particularly alveolar bone is poorly understood, and whether the mechanostat theory has any relevance to explaining the osseous changes that occur during orthodontic tooth movement remains unclear. To investigate the relationship further, an expansile force of 0.2 N was applied to the maxillary molars of 36, 6-week-old Wistar rats by helical coil springs. The animals were sacrificed at 1, 2, 4, and 8 days and the tissue response analyzed by histological, biochemical, and finite element (FE) methods. Differences between groups were determined by Student's <I>t</I>-test (two-tailed).</p>
<p>The appliance produced an increase in the intermolar width averaging 0.5 mm after 8 days. Tetracycline uptake in the control rats suggested a rapid turnover of bone in both the interradicular domain and the bone&ndash;periodontal ligament interface. In the experimental group, however, incorporation of tetracycline into the interradicular domain was reduced and conventional histology revealed evidence of bone loss and osteopenia, in both the experimental and a group of sham-treated positive controls (with inactive, annealed springs). Serum alkaline phosphatase declined significantly in both experimental and sham-treated groups over the 8-day time course, indicating decreased bone formation. Serum acid phosphatase also declined, suggesting a concomitant decrease in bone resorption. Three-dimensional FE analysis of the stresses generated in the bone following occlusal (2 N) and orthodontic loading showed that the orthodontic force created a constant loading condition shielding some areas of bone from mechanical stress. Areas of low mechanical stimulation were coincident with sites of bone loss observed histologically, while bone mass was preserved in areas with higher levels of loading.</p>
<p>These findings suggest that (1) the osteopenia resulted from stress shielding of the interradicular bone by the appliance, and a consequent reduction in occlusal loading below the critical threshold required for maintaining normal osseous architecture and (2) the mechanostat model can be employed to explain, at least in part, the response of the bone to orthodontic loading.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Milne, T. J., Ichim, I., Patel, B., McNaughton, A., Meikle, M. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-20</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ejo/cjp032</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Induction of osteopenia during experimental tooth movement in the rat: alveolar bone remodelling and the mechanostat theory]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Orthodontic Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>31</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>231</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>221</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/3/232?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The effect of force, timing, and location on bone-to-implant contact of miniscrew implants]]></title>
<link>http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/3/232?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of timing and force of loading, as well as implant location, on bone-to-implant contact (BIC) of loaded and control miniscrew implants (MSI). Using seven skeletally mature male beagle dogs, 1&ndash;2 years of age, followed over a 110 day period, a randomized split-mouth design compared immediate versus delayed loading, 50 versus 25 g loading, and 25 g loads in the maxilla versus the mandible. Mobility was evaluated using a 0&ndash;3 point scale before the MSIs were prepared for histological analysis. Histomorphometric analyses were performed under light microscopy using Metamorph&reg; software on undecalcified sections. The percentage BIC was measured at three levels (coronal, middle, and apical) of the MSI. BIC was compared statistically using pairwise Wilcoxon signed-rank tests.</p>
<p>Mobility was detected in three of the 56 (5.4 per cent) MSIs. The mobile implants were all unloaded controls and showed no BIC. All remaining stable MSIs showed some BIC. However, variation in BIC was large, ranging from 2.2 to 100 per cent. There were no significant (<I>P</I> &gt; 0.05) differences in BIC associated with timing of force application, amount of force applied, or implant location. There was a tendency for less BIC at the coronal level, but the differences between levels were not statistically significant. Within the limits of this study, it is concluded that the timing and amount of force at loading and location of implant placement do not affect BIC. Moreover, it appears that only limited amounts of osseointegration are necessary to ensure implant stability.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Woods, P. W., Buschang, P. H., Owens, S. E., Rossouw, P. E., Opperman, L. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-20</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ejo/cjn091</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The effect of force, timing, and location on bone-to-implant contact of miniscrew implants]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Orthodontic Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>31</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>240</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>232</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/3/241?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Comparison of cephalometric measurements with digital versus conventional cephalometric analysis]]></title>
<link>http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/3/241?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of angular and linear cephalometric measurements using a computerized method of direct digital radiographs. This was then compared with the measurements obtained with a computerized method that uses a digitizing pad and hand tracing of printout radiographs.</p>
<p>Pre-treatment digital cephalometric radiographs of 125 patients were traced using Vistadent 2.1 AT and Jiffy Orthodontic Evaluation (JOE) software programs and by hand tracing of the printouts. Twenty-six anatomical landmarks were defined on each radiograph by a single investigator and 28 variables were calculated. Statistical analysis was undertaken using one-way analysis of variance and multiple group comparisons using Duncan's test at a significance level of 0.05.</p>
<p>Low correlation coefficients indicated poor reproducibility for nasolabial angle for each of the three methods (<I>P</I> &gt; 0.05). Most of the variables showed consistency between the three methods except for nasolabial angle, ANS&ndash;Me, APFH, L1&ndash;NB, Nperp&ndash;Pg, Go&ndash;Me, and U1&ndash;NA measurements. The findings indicated that most of the cephalometric measurements were highly reproducible with direct digital radiographs using Vistadent 2.1 AT as well as with printouts using both JOE software and hand tracing. Despite the low correlation for some measurements between the Vistadent 2.1 AT, JOE, and hand-tracing methods, most of the commonly used measurements were accurate. The user-friendly and time-saving nature of the computerized method using digital radiographs makes it the preferred option.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Celik, E., Polat-Ozsoy, O., Toygar Memikoglu, T. U.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-20</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ejo/cjn105</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Comparison of cephalometric measurements with digital versus conventional cephalometric analysis]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Orthodontic Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>31</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>246</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>241</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/3/247?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A comparison of manual traced images and corresponding scanned radiographs digitally traced]]></title>
<link>http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/3/247?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of cephalometric measurements made with digital tracing software (FACAD&reg;) with equivalent hand-traced measurements, and to evaluate the reproducibility of each method.</p>
<p>Pre- and post-surgical lateral cephalographs of 30 adult patients (12 males and 18 females, median age = 25 years, standard deviation = 8.7) who had undergone orthognathic treatment were scanned into a computer. One operator identified 25 landmarks digitally on the computer display and manually on acetate paper. Measurements on the 60 radiographs were duplicated, and measurement error of each method was determined with interclass correlation. A paired <I>t</I>-test was used to detect differences between the manual and digital methods.</p>
<p>Overall, greater variability in digital cephalometric measurements was found. Differences in Gn&rsquo;, Li, Si, and Ii&ndash;Li measurements between the two methods were statistically (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.05), but not clinically significant.</p>
<p>The findings indicate that the results of the two investigated tracing methods are similar and that digital tracing with FACAD&reg; is reliable and can be used routinely.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Naoumova, J., Lindman, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-20</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ejo/cjn110</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A comparison of manual traced images and corresponding scanned radiographs digitally traced]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Orthodontic Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>31</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>253</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>247</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/3/254?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Differences in cephalometric measurements: a comparison of digital versus hand-tracing methods]]></title>
<link>http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/3/254?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of cephalometric measurements using computerized tracing of direct digital radiographs in comparison with hand tracing of digital radiographic printouts. Comparisons were made between methods in terms of accuracy of individual measurements as well as evaluation of treatment outcomes. Pre- (T1) and post- (T2) treatment cephalometric digital radiographs of 30 patients were traced using the Vistadent OC 1.1 computer software program (group 1) and manually (group 2) by the same investigator. A total of 26 anatomical landmarks were located and measured. Measurement reproducibility was evaluated by calculating intraclass correlation coefficients, and paired <I>t</I>-tests were used to compare differences in individual measurements and treatment outcomes between methods. Differences greater than 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.</p>
<p>Significant differences were found between the two methods for SNB, Wits appraisal, Cd&ndash;A, Cd&ndash;Gn, FMA, SN&ndash;PP, U1&ndash;NA (mm), U1&ndash;FH, L1&ndash;NB (mm), and Li&ndash;E plane. No significant differences were found between the two methods in the measurement of treatment changes. Cephalometric measurements of most parameters were reproducible for both methods. Despite some discrepancies in measured values between hand-tracing and the computerized method, any differences were minimal and clinically acceptable.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Polat-Ozsoy, O., Gokcelik, A., Toygar Memikoglu, T. U.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-20</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ejo/cjn121</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Differences in cephalometric measurements: a comparison of digital versus hand-tracing methods]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Orthodontic Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>31</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>259</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>254</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/3/260?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Morphological characterization of as-received and in vivo orthodontic stainless steel archwires]]></title>
<link>http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/3/260?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This study was undertaken to evaluate the material degradation of clinical bracket-archwire-contacting surfaces after <I>in vivo</I> orthodontic use. Twenty-four stainless steel multiloop edgewise archwires with two different cross sections (0.016 <FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT> 0.016 and 0.016 <FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT> 0.022 inches) were used for at least 6 months in the mouths of 14 patients. The surfaces of both as-received (cross-section of 0.016 <FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT> 0.016, 0.016 <FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT> 0.022, and 0.017 <FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT> 0.025 inches) and the <I>in vivo</I> wires were examined using scanning electron microscopy.</p>
<p>The as-received wires exhibited an inhomogeneous surface with different surface irregularities resulting from the manufacturing process. For the <I>in vivo</I> archwires, an increase in the variety, type, and number of surface irregularities were observed. Crevice corrosion occurred not only at surface irregularities formed during manufacturing and orthodontic handling but also at the bracket-archwire-contacting surfaces and at the archwire surfaces coated with plaque and food remnants. This corrosion may be linked to the formation of a micro-environment at these locations. In addition, a limited number of signs of degradation induced during <I>in vivo</I> testing due to wear and friction were observed.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daems, J., Celis, J.-P., Willems, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-20</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ejo/cjn104</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Morphological characterization of as-received and in vivo orthodontic stainless steel archwires]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Orthodontic Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>31</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>265</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>260</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/3/266?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Should silane coupling agents be used when bonding brackets to composite restorations? An in vitro study]]></title>
<link>http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/3/266?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The purpose of this <I>in vitro</I> study was to determine a safe and efficient method for bonding brackets to resin composite (RC), permitting the brackets to tolerate shear forces and allowing removal without causing surface damage to the aesthetic restoration. The shear bond strength (SBS) of 60 brackets bonded to silanated and non-silanated RC surfaces were compared. A Bis-GMA containing orthodontic adhesive system was used to bond stainless steel upper lateral incisor brackets to 60 composite discs, half of which had surface treatment with a silane coupling agent. SBS testing was performed with an Instron universal testing machine. After debond, the bracket base and corresponding RC discs were examined under a stereomicroscope and analyzed using the Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI).</p>
<p>Non-parametric tests (Mann&ndash;Whitney <I>U</I>) indicated significant differences between the two groups (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.009). Lower bond strengths were found for the silanated group implying that silane agents may be an unnecessary step. However, both groups had a clinically acceptable mean SBS [silanated group = 13.1 megapascals (Mpa), non-silanated group = 19.4 MPa]. Bond failure occurred at the bracket&ndash;adhesive interface in both groups. There would appear to be no advantage in using a silane agent when bonding metal orthodontic brackets to filled RCs.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eslamian, L., Ghassemi, A., Amini, F., Jafari, A., Afrand, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-20</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ejo/cjn106</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Should silane coupling agents be used when bonding brackets to composite restorations? An in vitro study]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Orthodontic Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>31</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>270</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>266</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/3/271?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Comparison of a recently developed nanofiller self-etching primer adhesive with other self-etching primers and conventional acid etching]]></title>
<link>http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/3/271?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The purpose of this <I>ex vivo</I> study was to compare the bond strengths and modes of failure of brackets bonded with three self-etching products [Adper Prompt L-Pop (3M Espe), Futurabond NR (Voco) and Transbond Plus (3M Unitek)] and a conventional 38 per cent phosphoric acid-etching system Etch-Rite (Pulpdent Corp.) at two different time points. Ninety-six defect-free premolars were randomly allocated to eight groups (<I>n</I> = 12). The etching procedure was carried out according to the manufacturers&rsquo; instructions. The shear bond strengths (SBSs) were measured after storage in distilled water for 12 and 24 hours. The brackets were debonded using a universal testing machine with a cross-head speed of 0.5 mm/minute. Multiple comparisons of the SBSs for the different etching types were performed using analysis of variance. The chi-square test was used to evaluate differences in adhesive remnant index (CARI) scores among the groups.</p>
<p>The differences between SBSs analysed at 12 and 24 hours were not significantly different. Although a significant difference (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.01) was observed with conventional and self-etching primer (SEP) adhesive systems, SEP revealed bond strengths higher than clinically accepted limits (6&ndash;8 MPa). SEP systems can achieve successful orthodontic bond strengths. The rate of development of the bond strength must be determined to ensure sufficient maturation of orthodontic adhesives before functional loading.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Basaran, G., Ozer, T., Devecioglu Kama, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-20</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ejo/cjn103</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Comparison of a recently developed nanofiller self-etching primer adhesive with other self-etching primers and conventional acid etching]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Orthodontic Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>31</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>275</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>271</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/3/276?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effects of adhesion promoters on the shear bond strengths of orthodontic brackets to fluorosed enamel]]></title>
<link>http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/3/276?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The aims of this <I>in vitro</I> study were to evaluate the effect of enamel fluorosis on the shear bond strength (SBS) of orthodontic brackets and to determine whether adhesion promoter, Enhance LC, increases the bond strength of brackets to fluorosed enamel.</p>
<p>Forty-five (30 fluorosed and 15 non-fluorosed) non-carious fresh human premolar teeth, extracted for orthodontic reasons and without any caries or visible defects, were used in this study. The fluorosed teeth were selected according to the modified Thylstrup and Fejerskov index, which is based on the clinical changes in fluorosed teeth. In groups 1 (fluorosed teeth) and 3 (control), the brackets were bonded with Light Bond composite resin and cured with a halogen light. In group 2, Enhance LC was applied to fluorosed enamel before bonding. After bonding, the SBS of the brackets was tested with a universal testing machine. One-way analysis of variance and Tukey multiple comparison tests were used to compare the SBS of the groups. Any adhesive remaining after debonding was assessed and scored according to the modified adhesive remnant index.</p>
<p>The results showed that while fluorosis significantly reduced the bond strengths of the orthodontic brackets (mean 13.94 &plusmn; 3.24 MPa; <I>P</I> &lt; 0.01), Enhance LC significantly increased bond strength on fluorosed enamel (mean 18.22 &plusmn; 5.97 Mpa; <I>P</I> &lt; 0.05). Groups 1 and 3 had greater bond failures at the composite&ndash;bracket interface, whereas group 2 showed bond failure primarily at the enamel&ndash;composite interface.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adanir, N., Turkkahraman, H., Yalcin Gungor, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-20</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ejo/cjn093</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effects of adhesion promoters on the shear bond strengths of orthodontic brackets to fluorosed enamel]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Orthodontic Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>31</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>280</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>276</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/3/281?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Index of Complexity, Outcome and Need scored on plaster and digital models]]></title>
<link>http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/3/281?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The aim of this study was to compare standard plaster models with their digital counterparts for the applicability of the Index of Complexity, Outcome, and Need (ICON). Generated study models of 30 randomly selected patients: 30 pre- (T<SUB>0</SUB>) and 30 post- (T<SUB>1</SUB>) treatment. Two examiners, calibrated in the ICON, scored the digital and plaster models. The overall ICON scores were evaluated for reliability and reproducibility using kappa statistics and reliability coefficients.</p>
<p>The values for reliability of the total and weighted ICON scores were generally high for the T<SUB>0</SUB> sample (range 0.83&ndash;0.95) but less high for the T<SUB>1</SUB> sample (range 0.55&ndash;0.85). Differences in total ICON score between plaster and digital models resulted in mostly statistically insignificant values (<I>P</I> values ranging from 0.07 to 0.19), except for observer 1 in the T<SUB>1</SUB> sample. No statistically different values were found for the total ICON score on either plaster or digital models.</p>
<p>ICON scores performed on computer-based models appear to be as accurate and reliable as ICON scores on plaster models.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Veenema, A. C., Katsaros, C., Boxum, S. C., Bronkhorst, E. M., Kuijpers-Jagtman, A. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-20</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ejo/cjn077</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Index of Complexity, Outcome and Need scored on plaster and digital models]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Orthodontic Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>31</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>286</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>281</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/3/287?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Orthodontic treatment practices in Finnish municipal health centres with differing timing of treatment]]></title>
<link>http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/3/287?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The aim of this study was to compare orthodontic practices in eight Finnish municipal health centres selected on the basis of an earlier survey to represent early and late timing of treatment. The health centres were grouped according to the mean age of starting treatment; earlier versus later than 9 years of age. A random sample of 16 and 18 year olds (<I>n</I> = 2325) living in these municipalities were invited for a clinical examination, and 1109 adolescents participated. The participants reported on their previous or ongoing orthodontic treatment by means of a questionnaire. Data on orthodontic treatment received were collected from the dental files of the adolescents who reported a treatment history and for those who did not recall exactly whether or not they had received orthodontic treatment. Analysis of the non-respondents was made on the basis of their dental files. Differences between the features of orthodontic treatment in the early and late starting health centres were analysed using a two-tailed <I>t</I>-test.</p>
<p>In the early group, 70 per cent, and in the late group 42 per cent, of adolescents had a history of orthodontic treatment. General dentists carried out 90 per cent of the treatment in the early group and specialists every third treatment in the late group. An early start resulted in more frequent visits (<I>P</I> = 0.004) and a longer treatment duration (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.001), while later timing resulted in an increase in the number of appliances (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.001).</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pietila, I., Pietila, T., Svedstrom-Oristo, A.-L., Varrela, J., Alanen, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-20</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ejo/cjn109</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Orthodontic treatment practices in Finnish municipal health centres with differing timing of treatment]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Orthodontic Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>31</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>293</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>287</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/3/294?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Occlusal status and prevalence of occlusal malocclusion traits among 9-year-old schoolchildren]]></title>
<link>http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/3/294?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The aim of this study was to provide detailed information concerning clinically relevant occlusal traits and the prevalence of occlusal anomalies in an orthodontically relevant period of dental development. Four hundred and ninety-four German schoolchildren (237 males and 257 females), median age 9 years, were orthodontically examined. Overjet and overbite were measured to the nearest 0.5 mm, and sagittal molar relationships were registered clinically to the nearest quarter unit. In addition, crossbites, scissor bites, and midline displacements were evaluated. Descriptive statistics was complemented by testing gender differences and differences between groups with Class I and Class II anomalies (Mann&ndash;Whitney <I>U</I>-test) as well as a statistical evaluation of differences between the three dental stages (Kruskal&ndash;Wallis test).</p>
<p>Overjet exhibited an extreme range between &ndash;2 and 12 mm (median values 3&ndash;3.5 mm). An increased overjet was more prevalent than a reduced or reverse overjet, and a severely increased overjet greater than 6 mm was a common finding affecting around 5&ndash;10 per cent of the children. Similarly, overbite showed considerable variations of between &ndash;1 and 9 mm (medians 3&ndash;3.5 mm) and males exhibited a significantly larger overbite than females. In Class II malocclusion subjects, overbite was significantly enlarged (on average between 0.5 and 1 mm) when compared with those with a Class I malocclusion. Traumatic contact of the gingiva affected every 14th child. A Class II molar relationship of three-quarter units or more was a frequent finding affecting more than one child in five. In addition, at 9 years of age, 3 per cent of the children exhibited a Class III molar relationship of at least a half unit. The wide range of orthodontically relevant occlusal traits found in the present study underlines the need for orthodontic screening at 9 years of age (or earlier).</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lux, C. J., Ducker, B., Pritsch, M., Komposch, G., Niekusch, U.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-20</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ejo/cjn116</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Occlusal status and prevalence of occlusal malocclusion traits among 9-year-old schoolchildren]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Orthodontic Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>31</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>299</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>294</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/3/300?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Craniofacial profile in Southern Chinese with hypodontia]]></title>
<link>http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/3/300?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The association between craniofacial morphology and congenitally missing teeth is at present unclear. The aims of this study were to investigate whether hypodontia is associated with changes in the sagittal skeletal profile and to identify putative relationships between the skeletal profile and the severity of hypodontia.</p>
<p>In a cross-sectional analytical study, the craniofacial structure and profile based on two-dimensional lateral cephalograms of Southern Chinese hypodontia patients (<I>n</I> = 49, 24 males, 25 females, mean age 16.4 years) and a comparison group without hypodontia (<I>n</I> = 41, 15 males, 26 females, mean age 16.7 years) were compared. The hypodontia patients were divided into three subgroups according to the severity of hypodontia (mild: &le;5, moderate: 6&ndash;9, and severe: &ge;10 congenitally missing permanent teeth).</p>
<p>All hypodontia patients had a significantly reduced mandibular plane, ANB, and face height compared with the control group (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.05). A significant increase in chin thickness was also observed in the hypodontia patients (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.05). As the severity of hypodontia increased from moderate to severe, a tendency to develop a retrognathic maxilla and a Class III skeletal relationship was noted in addition to the above features, making the already thick chin even more prominent. Statistically significant correlations (Pearson's correlation coefficient) were found between the number of missing teeth and SNA, NAFH, and ANB angles, the mandibular plane, chin thickness, and face height.</p>
<p>In Southern Chinese subjects, hypodontia was associated with a shorter face, a flatter mandibular plane, a more pronounced chin, and a Class III skeletal profile. In severe hypodontia subjects, the maxilla was more retrognathic with a greater predilection to a Class III skeletal relationship.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chan, D. W.S., Samman, N., McMillan, A. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-20</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ejo/cjn111</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Craniofacial profile in Southern Chinese with hypodontia]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Orthodontic Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>31</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>305</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>300</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/3/306?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Correlation between morphology and function of the upper lip: a longitudinal evaluation]]></title>
<link>http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/3/306?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>In order to evaluate the relationship between the morphology of the upper lip and muscle activity in a sample of 38 subjects (17 males and 21 females) with Angle Class II division 1 malocclusions, cephalometric and electromyographic analyses were conducted. The sample was subdivided into either predominantly nose or mouth breathers. The individuals were evaluated at two different periods, with a 2 year interval. At the first observation, the subjects were 11 years to 14 years 11 months of age and at the second observation, 13 years 4 months to 16 years 6 months of age. Height and thickness of the upper lip were measured on lateral cephalograms with the aid of a digital pachymeter. For each individual, electromyographic records were obtained of the orbicularis oris superior muscle at rest and in a series of 12 movements. The electromyographic data were normalized as a function of amplitude, for achievement of the percentage value of each movement. Pearson and Spearman correlation tests were applied.</p>
<p>The results showed some correlation between morphology and muscle function (at a confidence level of 95 per cent). However, as the values of the correlation coefficient (<I>r</I>) were too low to establish associations between variables, it was concluded that the dimensions of the upper lip are not correlated with muscle activity.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ambrosio, A. R., Trevilatto, P. C., Sakima, T., Ignacio, S. A., Shimizu, R. H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-20</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ejo/cjn112</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Correlation between morphology and function of the upper lip: a longitudinal evaluation]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Orthodontic Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>31</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>313</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>306</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/3/314?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Pain intensity during the first 7 days following the application of light and heavy continuous forces]]></title>
<link>http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/3/314?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The purpose of the present study was to determine whether a force of 20 cN can be biologically active for tooth movement and to examine the pain intensity during the application of light (20 cN) or heavy (200 cN) continuous forces for 7 days.</p>
<p>In the first experiment, a force of 20 cN was applied to eight canines in five volunteers. The mean tooth movement during 10 weeks was 2.4 mm. In the second experiment, two forces of 20 or 200 cN were applied to maxillary premolars in 12 male subjects (aged 24&ndash;31 years) to measure pain intensity for 7 days. Spontaneous and biting pain were recorded every 2&ndash;4 hours on a 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS). Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used for statistical analysis.</p>
<p>Comparing the VAS score at force initiation with the other time points, there was no significant difference in spontaneous pain for either group, or in biting pain for the light-force group. However, biting pain in the heavy-force group during the time period from 6 to 156 hours was significantly (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.05) greater than that at force initiation. Comparing the VAS scores between the light- and heavy-force group, VAS scores for biting pain in the heavy-force group during the time period from 8 to 100 hours was significantly (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.05) greater than that in the light-force group.</p>
<p>A force of 20 cN can move teeth, but pain intensity while biting may be greater approximately 8 hours to 5 days following the application of heavy continuous force compared with light force.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ogura, M., Kamimura, H., Al-Kalaly, A., Nagayama, K., Taira, K., Nagata, J., Miyawaki, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-20</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ejo/cjn072</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Pain intensity during the first 7 days following the application of light and heavy continuous forces]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Orthodontic Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>31</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>319</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>314</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/3/320?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Routine treatment of bilateral aplasia of upper lateral incisors by orthodontic space closure without mandibular extractions]]></title>
<link>http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/3/320?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This study aimed to gather statistically validated information on the changes in orthodontic variables in patients with bilateral upper lateral incisor aplasia treated with isolated orthodontic space closure. Data were collected from 25 (15 females, 10 males) consecutively treated, unselected adolescents [mean age at the end of treatment 16.4 years, standard deviation (SD) 1.3] after orthodontic space closure using push-and-pull mechanics (PPM). The changes in the relevant parameters were determined by comparing baseline and final lateral headfilms and casts. Following verification of normal distribution by means of a Kolmogorov&ndash;Smirnov test, a two-tailed <I>t</I>-test for related data was performed.</p>
<p>SNA, ANB, OcP-NL, OcP-ML, upper space balance, overbite, overjet, bilateral molar relationship, and L1-NB changed significantly (<I>P</I> &le; 0.05) during treatment. The changes in overbite, overjet, spatial conditions, and molar relationship were in line with the targeted treatment objectives and within the normal range. Although the change in L1-NB was probably due to treatment, it was not clinically relevant given that the mean final values were close to normal at 22.8 degrees (SD 5.8&deg;) for L1-NB and 95 degrees (SD 8&deg;) for L1-ML.</p>
<p>Isolated orthodontic space closure for bilateral upper lateral incisor aplasia using PPM can be regarded as a valid alternative to prosthetic solutions. Long-term use of Class III elastics does not lead to significant changes in relevant orthodontic parameters.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zimmer, B., Seifi-Shirvandeh, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-20</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ejo/cjn100</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Routine treatment of bilateral aplasia of upper lateral incisors by orthodontic space closure without mandibular extractions]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Orthodontic Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>31</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>326</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>320</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/3/327?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Antero-posterior and transverse changes in the positions of palatal rugae after rapid maxillary expansion]]></title>
<link>http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/3/327?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The purpose of this study was to investigate the stability of the medial aspects of the rugae in patients where rapid maxillary expansion (RME) was performed in addition to fixed appliance therapy. Nineteen subjects that met the inclusion criteria for each group were randomly selected from the archive of one orthodontist office. The RME/fixed appliances group consisted of 8 males and 11 females (mean age pre-treatment 12.4 &plusmn; 2.0 years). The control group treated with fixed appliances only, consisted of 6 males and 13 females (mean pre-treatment age of 12.5 &plusmn; 2.1 years). The medial aspects of the rugae were recorded on the pre- and post-treatment dental models by means of a standardized photographic set-up. The transverse and antero-posterior positional rugae changes were measured. Kolmogorov&ndash;Smirnov normality tests were performed and paired <I>t</I>-tests were used to determine differences between and within the groups.</p>
<p>The addition of RME to fixed appliance therapy caused a change in transverse measurements between the medial aspects of the bilateral rugae. There was no change in antero-posterior measurements (APM). The transverse changes were more marked for the third, less for the second rugae, and the least for the first rugae. The medial aspects of the third rugae cannot be considered as stable reference landmarks for dental cast analysis when RME is performed in addition to fixed appliance therapy.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Damstra, J., Mistry, D., Cruz, C., Ren, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-20</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ejo/cjn113</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Antero-posterior and transverse changes in the positions of palatal rugae after rapid maxillary expansion]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Orthodontic Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>31</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>332</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>327</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/3/333?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Comparative efficiency of Class II malocclusion treatment with the pendulum appliance or two maxillary premolar extractions and edgewire appliances]]></title>
<link>http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/3/333?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The objective of this study was to compare, on study models and initial cephalograms, the efficiency of Class II malocclusion treatment with the pendulum appliance, and with two maxillary premolar extraction protocol. The sample consisted of 48 treated Class II malocclusion patients: group 1 comprised 22 patients (7 males, 15 females) treated with the pendulum appliance, with an initial mean age of 14.44 years and group 2, 26 patients (14 males, 12 females) treated with two maxillary premolar extractions at an initial mean age of 13.66 years. To compare the efficiency of each treatment protocol, the occlusal outcomes were evaluated on dental casts using the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) Index and the treatment time (TT) of each group was calculated on clinical charts. The degree of treatment efficiency was calculated as the ratio between the percentage of occlusal improvement, evaluated through the PAR index, and TT. Statistical analysis was undertaken by means of <I>t</I>-tests.</p>
<p>The findings demonstrated that the two maxillary premolar extraction protocol provided the occlusal outcomes in a shorter time (group 1: 45.7 months, group 2: 23.01 months) and, therefore, demonstrated greater treatment efficiency than the pendulum appliance.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pinzan-Vercelino, C. R. M., Janson, G., Pinzan, A., de Almeida, R. R., de Freitas, M. R., de Freitas, K. M. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-20</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ejo/cjn115</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Comparative efficiency of Class II malocclusion treatment with the pendulum appliance or two maxillary premolar extractions and edgewire appliances]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Orthodontic Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>31</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>340</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>333</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/3/341?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Evidence-based dentistry: managing information for better practice (2008)]]></title>
<link>http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/3/341?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kuijpers-Jagtman, A. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-20</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ejo/cjp025</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Evidence-based dentistry: managing information for better practice (2008)]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Orthodontic Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>31</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>341</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>341</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Book Reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/3/341-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Illustrated lecture notes in oral and maxillofacial surgery (2008)]]></title>
<link>http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/3/341-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robinson, P. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-20</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ejo/cjp026</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Illustrated lecture notes in oral and maxillofacial surgery (2008)]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Orthodontic Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>31</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>342</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>341</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Book Reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/3/342?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Management of cleft lip and palate in the developing world (2008)]]></title>
<link>http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/3/342?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Katsaros, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-20</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ejo/cjp027</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Management of cleft lip and palate in the developing world (2008)]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Orthodontic Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>31</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>342</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>342</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Book Reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/3/343?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Osseointegration. On continuing synergies in surgery, prosthodontics and biomaterials (2008)]]></title>
<link>http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/3/343?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thilander, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-20</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ejo/cjp028</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Osseointegration. On continuing synergies in surgery, prosthodontics and biomaterials (2008)]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Orthodontic Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>31</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>343</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>343</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Book Reviews</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>