<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org">
<title>The European Journal of Orthodontics - current issue</title>
<link>http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org</link>
<description>The European Journal of Orthodontics - RSS feed of current issue</description>
<prism:eIssn>1460-2210</prism:eIssn>
<prism:coverDisplayDate>February 2010</prism:coverDisplayDate>
<prism:publicationName>The European Journal of Orthodontics</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>0141-5387</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/32/1/1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/32/1/6?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/32/1/11?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/32/1/19?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/32/1/24?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/32/1/28?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/32/1/36?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/32/1/43?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/32/1/49?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/32/1/54?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/32/1/60?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/32/1/66?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/32/1/71?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/32/1/78?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/32/1/83?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/32/1/87?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/32/1/94?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/32/1/100?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/32/1/106?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/32/1/114?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/32/1/114-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/32/1/115?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/32/1/116?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
</channel>

<item rdf:about="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/32/1/1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A randomized clinical trial of thermoplastic retainer wear]]></title>
<link>http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/32/1/1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The purpose of this study was to determine whether thermoplastic retainers need to be worn full-time for a limited period or whether part-time wear from the outset is adequate to maintain tooth position, arch form, and occlusion. This study was a randomized clinical trail, conducted in a district general hospital. Sixty-two participants were enrolled in the study. Group 1, full-time wear, consisted of 30 patients (12 males and 18 females, aged 13.6 &plusmn; 1.5 years) and group 2, part-time wear, 32 patients (14 males and 18 females, aged 13.8 &plusmn; 1.5 years).</p>
<p>Each patient was assigned to one of the groups by random number generation. Clinical records in the form of study models were taken at the start of active treatment (T1), at debond (T2), 6 months into the retention phase (T3), and 1 year post-debond (T4). The irregularity index, intercanine width, intermolar width, arch length, overbite, overjet, and Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) scores were measured on study models using digital callipers. A Mann&ndash;Whitney test was used to evaluate the treatment changes within each group.</p>
<p>The only statistically significant difference was found to be at T3 and T4 for overbite (<I>P</I> = 0.05 and <I>P</I> = 0.02, respectively). PAR scoring showed more variable changes in group 2. There was good correlation for the measurement method. There was no statistical difference for the two groups for overjet, arch length, intermolar width, intercanine width, and irregularity index at any time point.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thickett, E., Power, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 04:13:31 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ejo/cjp061</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A randomized clinical trial of thermoplastic retainer wear]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Orthodontic Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/32/1/6?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effects of thermoplastic retainers on occlusal contacts]]></title>
<link>http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/32/1/6?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the number of contacts in centric occlusion during retention with thermoplastic retainers (Essix retainers) and in the long term. After four premolar extractions and active orthodontic treatment of 15 Class I (10 females, 5 males; mean age 17.20 &plusmn; 1.7 years), thermoplastic retainers were used. Occlusal contacts were determined from occlusal registrations taken in centric occlusion at the beginning (T0), end (9 months of retention; T1), and after 2.5 years (T2). The occlusal contacts determined in these patients were compared with the values of 15 &lsquo;normal&rsquo; Class I subjects (9 females, 6 males; mean age 17.10 &plusmn; 1.60 years) who had not undergone orthodontic treatment. Wilcoxon and a Mann&ndash;Whitney <I>U</I>-tests were used to evaluate intra- and intergroup differences.</p>
<p>No significant change was observed in the number of posterior contacts during T1, whereas a significant increase was found at T2 (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.01) for the second premolars (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.01) and second molars (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.05). Both &lsquo;ideal&rsquo; and &lsquo;non-ideal&rsquo; contacts increased significantly but only at T2 (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.05). The number of ideally located contacts on the posterior teeth at all three periods were lower than normal values (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.01); while non-ideal contacts at T1 (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.05) and T2 (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.01) were found more often when compared with the values of normal subjects. Only the increased number of premolar contacts at T2 was more than normal values (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.01). There was no expected increase in occlusal contacts at T2; however, posterior occlusal contacts were increased at T3.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dincer, M., Isik Aslan, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 04:13:31 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ejo/cjp062</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effects of thermoplastic retainers on occlusal contacts]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Orthodontic Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>10</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>6</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/32/1/11?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Maxillary expansion in the mixed dentition: rapid or semi-rapid?]]></title>
<link>http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/32/1/11?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of rapid maxillary expansion (RME) and semi-rapid maxillary expansion (SRME) in the mixed dentition period. The SRME group consisted of 18 patients (11 girls and 7 boys) with a mean age of 8.63 &plusmn; 1.09 years and the RME group 17 patients (11 girls and 6 boys) with a mean age of 8.78 &plusmn; 1.21 years. A splint type tooth- and tissue-borne modified bonded RME appliance was used, with the patients activating the screw two-quarter turns per day for the first week, followed by one-quarter turn every other day in the SRME group and two-quarter turns per day throughout treatment in the RME group. The average treatment time was 57.16 &plusmn; 21.52 and 21.23 &plusmn; 8.36 days for the SRME and RME groups, respectively. A Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to evaluate the treatment effects [pre-(T<SUB>0</SUB>) &ndash; post-(T<SUB>1</SUB>) treatment changes] for both the SRME and RME groups and a Mann&ndash;Whitney <I>U</I>-test to determine the differences between the two groups (T<SUB>0</SUB>&ndash;T<SUB>1</SUB> changes SRME versus T<SUB>0</SUB>&ndash;T<SUB>1</SUB> changes RME).</p>
<p>For both groups, the maxillary base, nasal cavity width and upper intercanine and intermolar distances were increased, and the upper molars tipped buccally. The only statistically significant (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.05) difference between two groups was in inferior movement of posterior nasal spine (PNS) relative to the SN plane (SNPNS). This measurement increased in both groups yet significantly more in the RME group. The results suggest that RME and SRME have similar effects on dentofacial structures both in the transverse, vertical, and sagittal planes.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ramoglu, S. I., Sari, Z.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 04:13:31 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ejo/cjp057</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Maxillary expansion in the mixed dentition: rapid or semi-rapid?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Orthodontic Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>18</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>11</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/32/1/19?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Mandibular asymmetry in cleft lip and palate patients]]></title>
<link>http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/32/1/19?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The aims of this study were to evaluate condylar, ramal, and condylar plus ramal mandibular vertical asymmetry in a group of cleft lip and palate (CLP) patients and compared with subjects with a &lsquo;normal&rsquo; occlusion. Mandibular asymmetry index (condylar, ramal, and condylar plus ramal) and gonial angle measurements were examined on panoramic radiographs. The study groups comprised 20 unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) patients (10 males and 10 females; mean age 13.03 &plusmn; 3.33 years), 20 bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP) patients (10 males and 10 females; mean age 13.73 &plusmn; 3.53 years), and a control group of 20 subjects (9 males and 11 females; mean age 14.35 &plusmn; 2.46 years) with a normal occlusion. Kruskal&ndash;Wallis one-way analysis of variance was used to determine statistically significant differences between the groups for condylar, ramal, and condylar plus ramal asymmetry index measurements at the 95 per cent confidence interval.</p>
<p>None of the investigated groups showed statistically significant gender differences for posterior vertical height measurements (<I>P</I> &gt; 0.05). Asymmetry indices were similar, with no statistically significant differences found in any of the groups. However, gonial angle showed statistically significant differences (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.05) in the UCLP group and condylar height (CH) in the BCLP patients (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.001). Except for CH measurement in the BCLP group, CLP patients have symmetrical mandibles when compared with a normal occlusion sample.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kurt, G., Bayram, M., Uysal, T., Ozer, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 04:13:31 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ejo/cjp063</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Mandibular asymmetry in cleft lip and palate patients]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Orthodontic Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>23</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>19</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/32/1/24?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A cephalometric intercentre comparison of patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate at 5 and 10 years of age]]></title>
<link>http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/32/1/24?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The aim of this study was to evaluate any differences between the craniofacial growth of unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) patients who underwent surgery in the Milan CLP centre with those from the Oslo CLP centre at 5 and 10 years of age.</p>
<p>The Milan sample comprised 88 UCLP patients (60 males, 28 females) at 5 years of age and 26 patients (17 males, 9 females) at 10 years of age all operated on by the same surgeon. The Oslo sample consisted of 48 UCLP patients (26 males, 22 females) aged 5 years and 29 patients (20 males, 9 females) aged 10 years treated by four different surgeons. Lateral cephalometric radiographs obtained for both samples were analysed and angular measurements and ratios were calculated both for the hard and soft tissues. Statistical analysis was undertaken with an unpaired <I>t</I>-test.</p>
<p>At 5 years of age, there were neither sagittal nor vertical hard tissue differences between the two groups. With regard to the soft tissues, only the naso-labial angle showed a statistically significant difference (Milan greater than Oslo by 5 degrees, <I>P</I> &lt; 0.01). At 10 years of age, both SNA and ANB differences were larger in the Oslo group than in the Milan group, &gt;2.6 degrees, <I>P</I> &lt; 0.01 and &gt;2.9 degrees, <I>P</I> &lt; 0.001, respectively.</p>
<p>At 5 years of age, the Milan UCLP sample had the same maxillary protrusion as the Oslo group, while at 10 years of age, the Milan sample were slightly less protruded than the Oslo group.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Del Guercio, F., Meazzini, M. C., Garattini, G., Morabito, A., Semb, G., Brusati, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 04:13:31 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ejo/cjn051</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A cephalometric intercentre comparison of patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate at 5 and 10 years of age]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Orthodontic Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>27</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>24</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/32/1/28?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Long-term stability of dentoalveolar and skeletal changes after activator-headgear treatment]]></title>
<link>http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/32/1/28?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The aim of this study was to analyze the long-term stability of combined activator&ndash;headgear treatment on skeletal and dental structures in Class II patients. The material comprised 26 subjects, 10 girls and 16 boys. All had a molar Class II relationship, overjet &ge;6 mm, and overbite &ge;5 mm. They were treated in one practice with combined activator and headgear appliances. Lateral cephalometric radiographs and dental study casts were taken before treatment (T0, mean age 11.9 years), at the end of activator&ndash;headgear treatment (T1, mean age 15.9 years), and 12&ndash;15 years out of retention (T2, mean age 28.6 years). Nineteen cephalometric and nine dental cast variables were evaluated using a paired sample <I>t</I>-test between T0&ndash;T1, T1&ndash;T2, and T0&ndash;T2.</p>
<p>At T1, the majority of the cephalometric measurements showed statistically significant changes. ANB was significantly reduced by 2.3 degrees due to a significant increase in SNB, but only small changes were observed in SNA. The interincisal angle increased as a result of significant retroclination of both maxillary and mandibular incisors. All patients achieved a Class I molar relationship and a significant reduction in overjet and overbite. At T2, the results showed only slight relapse from T1. However, the relapse did not compromise the significant improvement in almost all the cephalometric and dental variables. Combined activator&ndash;headgear treatment improved the skeletal and dental conditions and the results remained stable in the long term.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lerstol, M., Torget, O., Vandevska-Radunovic, V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 04:13:31 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ejo/cjp042</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Long-term stability of dentoalveolar and skeletal changes after activator-headgear treatment]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Orthodontic Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>35</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>28</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/32/1/36?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cervical vertebrae anomalies in orthodontic patients: a growth-based superimpositional approach]]></title>
<link>http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/32/1/36?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The purpose of this study was to propose a growth-based structural superimposition method for assessment of cervical vertebral fusion and evaluate variations and abnormalities of the upper cervical vertebrae. Standardized lateral cephalograms of 156 patients (69 males and 87 females, age range 6&ndash;20 years), representing a skeletally heterogeneous orthodontic population, were used. Primary criterion for sample selection was the existence of at least two lateral cephalograms, one taken before orthodontic treatment, which depicted the first four cervical vertebrae. The abnormalities of the vertebrae were estimated by visual assessment and structural superimposition. Lateral cephalometric analysis was conducted in order to correlate vertebral anomalies to skeletal pattern. Descriptive statistics were calculated for all variables and interobserver agreement was evaluated using the kappa statistic.</p>
<p>Four patients (2.6 per cent) were found to have secondary ossicles in close relationship to the first cervical vertebra, while in 7.4 per cent, the vertebral arteries of the atlas were surrounded by a complete ring-shaped osseous structure. Three cephalograms showed atlas posterior arch dehiscence. After visual examination, 14 patients were provisionally identified as presenting fusion between the second and third cervical vertebrae. However, growth-based superimposition of the radiographs disclosed that no patient showed actual fusion, even though the lateral cephalometric analysis revealed sufficient extreme skeletal patterns, which have been previously related to vertebral fusion.</p>
<p>The findings of this study demonstrated a low percentage of atlas anomalies. It was not possible to correlate skeletal pattern to fusion of cervical vertebrae because no fusions were found. Subjective visual examination of a single cephalogram may result in false-positive findings of fusion and growth-based superimposition is recommended.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Koletsis, D. D., Halazonetis, D. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 04:13:31 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ejo/cjp049</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cervical vertebrae anomalies in orthodontic patients: a growth-based superimpositional approach]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Orthodontic Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>42</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>36</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/32/1/43?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Quality of life in patients with severe malocclusion before treatment]]></title>
<link>http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/32/1/43?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The aim of this study was to determine the occurrence of oral health impacts among patients with severe malocclusions and dentofacial deformities before treatment. A further aim was to evaluate the effect of gender or the type of malocclusion on the oral impacts.</p>
<p>The study comprised 151 adult patients who were referred for orthodontic or surgical-orthodontic treatment to the Oral and Maxillofacial Department, Oulu University Hospital, Finland during the years 2001&ndash;2004. The study group consisted of 92 females and 59 males with a mean age of 35.5 years [standard deviation (SD) 11.5 years, range 16&ndash;64 years]. A self-completed Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP)-14 questionnaire was used to measure oral impacts during a 1 month reference period. The prevalence, extent, and severity scores were calculated from the OHIP-14. Malocclusions were registered at clinical examination. The prevalence and mean extent and severity scores were compared among malocclusion groups and between genders. Statistical significance was evaluated with Mann&ndash;Whitney, Kruskall&ndash;Wallis, Chi-squared, and Fisher's exact tests.</p>
<p>The prevalence of oral impacts perceived fairly or very often was 70.2 per cent. The mean severity and extent scores were 17.2 (SD 10.5, range 0&ndash;45) and 2.5 (SD 2.6, range 0&ndash;10), respectively. Physical pain as well as psychological discomfort and disability were the most commonly perceived oral impacts. Being self-conscious, feeling tense, having difficulties in relaxing, and being somewhat irritable with other people were more common in females than in males. No differences were observed in oral impacts among the malocclusion groups.</p>
<p>Compared with a &lsquo;normal&rsquo; population, patients with severe malocclusions report high levels of oral impacts. Females reported oral impacts more often than males.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rusanen, J., Lahti, S., Tolvanen, M., Pirttiniemi, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 04:13:31 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ejo/cjp065</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Quality of life in patients with severe malocclusion before treatment]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Orthodontic Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>48</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>43</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/32/1/49?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prevalence of orthodontic treatment need in southern Italian schoolchildren]]></title>
<link>http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/32/1/49?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The present survey was performed to determine orthodontic treatment need in a large sample (<I>n</I> = 703) of 12-year-old schoolchildren from the southern part of Italy. The sample comprised 331 males (47 per cent) and 372 females (53 per cent), all orthodontically untreated. Two examiners, who had been previously trained in the use of occlusal indices, screened all the schoolchildren. The prevalence rates for the Dental Health Component (DHC) of the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN) as well as for occlusal features (Angle Class, overjet, overbite, crowding, posterior crossbite) were calculated for the total sample. The IOTN grades were statistically compared in the two genders using the chi-square test.</p>
<p>The findings indicated that this southern Italian school population showed a rather low prevalence rate for objective need for treatment (grades 4 and 5; 27.3 per cent of the total sample). This prevalence rate is generally lower than those reported in northern and central European countries (Sweden, Germany, and UK) but slightly greater than those in France. No significant differences in the DHC grades of the IOTN were found between genders. Among the occlusal features diagnosed in the subjects examined, a high prevalence rate was found for crowding (45.9 per cent). Moreover, posterior crossbites and Class III malocclusions, which would presumably have benefited from early orthodontic intervention, were still present in 14.2 and 4.3 per cent of the students, respectively.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Perillo, L., Masucci, C., Ferro, F., Apicella, D., Baccetti, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 04:13:31 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ejo/cjp050</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prevalence of orthodontic treatment need in southern Italian schoolchildren]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Orthodontic Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>53</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>49</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/32/1/54?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[An evaluation of clinicians' choices when selecting archwires]]></title>
<link>http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/32/1/54?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The aim of this research was to determine the choices made by clinicians with respect to archwires and arch form during the initial and latter stages of orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances.</p>
<p>A questionnaire-based study was carried out at Bristol Dental Hospital between November 2005 and March 2006. Questionnaires were distributed within the dental hospital and at local meetings in order to obtain a mixed sample of hospital and practice-based orthodontists. The clinicians asked to complete the questionnaire were consultant orthodontists (<I>n</I> = 37), specialist practitioners (<I>n</I> = 36), senior specialist registrars in orthodontics (<I>n</I> = 10), and dentists with a special interest in orthodontics (<I>n</I> = 17). The questionnaire consisted of two parts: the first was concerned with the initial alignment phase of treatment and the second with the space-closing phase of treatment in premolar extraction cases. The choice of archwires, significance of arch form, and intra-arch dimensions considered important at both stages were assessed. The clinicians were also asked about their usual practice with regard to adaptation of working archwires and the use of study models and symmetry charts.</p>
<p>One hundred questionnaires were returned, giving a response rate of 92.6 per cent. The majority of clinicians felt that preservation of the pre-treatment arch form was essential in the latter but not in the early stages of treatment. In particular, conservation of the original intercanine width was considered important. However, there was no uniformity in how arch form should be preserved. Some respondents used study models and symmetry charts as an aid, but even then they were used in different ways. There was no uniformity in the landmarks used when adapting stainless steel archwires to arch form. Therefore, even when clinicians do adapt their archwires carefully with the intention of preserving arch form, are they choosing the correct arch form?</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[McNamara, C., Drage, K. J., Sandy, J. R., Ireland, A. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 04:13:31 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ejo/cjp051</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[An evaluation of clinicians' choices when selecting archwires]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Orthodontic Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>59</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>54</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/32/1/60?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Chondroitin sulphate (WF6 epitope) levels in peri-miniscrew implant crevicular fluid during orthodontic loading]]></title>
<link>http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/32/1/60?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The aim of this study was to monitor changes in chondroitin sulphate (CS; WF6 epitope) levels in peri-miniscrew implant crevicular fluid (PMICF) during orthodontic loading.</p>
<p>Ten patients (seven males and three females; aged 22.0 &plusmn; 3.4 years), who required orthodontic treatment with extraction of all four premolar teeth, participated in the study. Twenty miniscrew implants (used as orthodontic anchorage) were placed, two in each patient, buccally and bilaterally in the alveolar bone between the roots of the maxillary posterior teeth. Sentalloy closed-coil springs (50 g) were used to load the miniscrew implants and to move the maxillary canines distally. During the unloaded period, PMICF samples were collected on days 1, 3, 5, and 7 after miniscrew implant placement and on days 14, 21, 28, and 35 during the loaded period. Clinical mobility assessments of the miniscrew implants were recorded at each visit. The competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay with monoclonal antibody WF6 was used to detect CS (WF6 epitope) levels in the PMICF samples. The differences between the CS (WF6 epitope) levels during the unloaded and loaded periods were determined by a Mann&ndash;Whitney <I>U</I>-test.</p>
<p>During the loaded period, two miniscrew implants were considered to have failed. The CS (WF6 epitope) levels during the unloaded period ranged from 0.00 to 758.03 ng/ml and those during the loaded period from 0.00 to 1025.11 ng/ml. Medians of CS (WF6 epitope) levels, around &lsquo;immobile&rsquo; miniscrew implants, between the unloaded and loaded periods were not significantly different (<I>P</I> = 0.07).</p>
<p>CS (WF6 epitope) levels in PMICF can be detected and may be used as biomarkers for assessing alveolar bone remodelling around miniscrew implants during orthodontic loading.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Intachai, I., Krisanaprakornkit, S., Kongtawelert, P., Ong-chai, S., Buranastidporn, B., Suzuki, E. Y., Jotikasthira, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 04:13:31 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ejo/cjp056</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Chondroitin sulphate (WF6 epitope) levels in peri-miniscrew implant crevicular fluid during orthodontic loading]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Orthodontic Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>65</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>60</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/32/1/66?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effects of mastication on mandibular growth evaluated by microcomputed tomography]]></title>
<link>http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/32/1/66?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>It is well known that mastication has a significant influence on mandibular growth and development, but the mechanism behind this effect has not yet been clarified. Furthermore, no studies have examined the effects of changes in mastication on the three-dimensional (3D) morphometry of the mandible. The aim of the present study was to investigate the influences of changes in mastication on mandibular growth and morphology. Twenty-five 3-week-old (at the time of weaning) imprinting control region mice were randomly divided into three groups: mice fed a hard diet (HD), mice fed a soft diet (SD), and mice alternately fed hard and soft diets (HSDs) every week for 4 weeks. The morphometry of the mandible was analysed using 3D microcomputed tomography (&micro;CT). Statistical analysis was undertaken using a <I>t</I>-test.</p>
<p>&micro;CT analysis showed that the condylar width was significantly greater in the HD group than in the SD group after 1 week. After 4 weeks, mandibular length was significantly longer and ramus height was greater in the HSD group than in the other two groups. Bone volume was significantly less in the SD group than in the other two groups after 4 weeks. These findings suggest that changes in mastication markedly affect mandibular condylar cartilage growth and mandibular morphology. It is considered that dietary education at an early age is important in order to prevent disruption of the development of the mandible.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Enomoto, A., Watahiki, J., Yamaguchi, T., Irie, T., Tachikawa, T., Maki, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 04:13:31 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ejo/cjp060</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effects of mastication on mandibular growth evaluated by microcomputed tomography]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Orthodontic Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>70</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>66</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/32/1/71?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Maximum occlusal bite forces in Jordanian individuals with different dentofacial vertical skeletal patterns]]></title>
<link>http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/32/1/71?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This study was carried out to record maximum occlusal bite force (MBF) in Jordanian students with three different facial types: short, average, and long, and to determine the effect of gender, type of functional occlusion, and the presence of premature contacts and parafunctional habits on MBF. Sixty dental students (30 males and 30 females) were divided into three equal groups based on the maxillomandibular planes angle (Max/Mand) and degree of anterior overlap: included short-faced students with a deep anterior overbite (Max/Mand &le; 22 degrees), normal-faced students with a normal overbite that served as the controls (Max/Mand = 27 &plusmn; 5 degrees), and long-faced students with an anterior open bite (Max/Mand &ge; 32 degrees). Their age ranged between 20 and 23 years. MBF was measured using a hydraulic occlusal force gauge. Occlusal factors, including the type of functional occlusion, the presence of premature contacts, and parafunctional habits, were recorded. Differences between groups were assessed using a <I>t</I>-test and analysis of variance.</p>
<p>The average MBF in Jordanian adults was 573.42 &plusmn; 140.18 N. Those with a short face had the highest MBF (679.60 &plusmn; 117.46 N) while the long-face types had the lowest MBF (453.57 &plusmn; 98.30 N; <I>P</I> &lt; 0.001). The average MBF was 599.02 &plusmn; 145.91 in males and 546.97 &plusmn; 131.18 in females (<I>P</I> = 0.149). No gender differences were observed. The average MBF was higher in patients with premature contacts than those without, while it did not differ in subjects with different types of functional occlusion or in the presence of parafunctional habits.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Abu Alhaija, E. S. J., Al Zo'ubi, I. A., Al Rousan, M. E., Hammad, M. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 04:13:31 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ejo/cjp069</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Maximum occlusal bite forces in Jordanian individuals with different dentofacial vertical skeletal patterns]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Orthodontic Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>77</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>71</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/32/1/78?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Are nano-composites and nano-ionomers suitable for orthodontic bracket bonding?]]></title>
<link>http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/32/1/78?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The aim of this study was to test nano-composite (Filtek Supreme Plus Universal) and a newly introduced nano-ionomer (Ketac<SUP><SMALL><SMALL>TM</SMALL></SMALL></SUP> N100 Light Curing Nano-Ionomer) restorative to determine their shear bond strength (SBS) and failure site locations in comparison with a conventional light-cure orthodontic bonding adhesive (Transbond XT). Sixty freshly extracted human maxillary premolar teeth were arbitrarily divided into three equal groups. The brackets were bonded to the teeth in each group with different composites, according to the manufacturers&rsquo; instructions. The SBS values of the brackets were recorded in Megapascals (MPa) using a universal testing machine. Adhesive remnant index scores were determined after failure of the brackets. The data were analysed using analysis of variance, Tukey honestly significant difference, and chi-square tests.</p>
<p>The results demonstrated that group 1 (Transbond XT, mean: 12.60 &plusmn; 4.48 MPa) had a higher SBS than that of group 2 (nano-composite, mean: 8.33 &plusmn; 5.16 MPa; <I>P</I> &lt; 0.05) and group 3 (nano-ionomer, mean: 6.14 &plusmn; 2.12 MPa; <I>P</I> &lt; 0.001). No significant differences in debond locations were found among the three groups. Nano-composites and nano-ionomers may be suitable for bonding since they fulfil the previously suggested SBS ranges for clinical acceptability, but they are inferior to a conventional orthodontic composite.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Uysal, T., Yagci, A., Uysal, B., Akdogan, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 04:13:31 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ejo/cjp012</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Are nano-composites and nano-ionomers suitable for orthodontic bracket bonding?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Orthodontic Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>82</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>78</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/32/1/83?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Degree of conversion and hardness of an orthodontic resin cured with a light-emitting diode and a quartz-tungsten-halogen light]]></title>
<link>http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/32/1/83?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The purpose of this study was to assess the influence of two light units, a quartz&ndash;tungsten&ndash;halogen (QTH) and a light-emitting diode (LED), on the hardness and degree of conversion of an orthodontic composite resin. Sixty specimen disks were prepared from Transbond XT composite resin (3M Unitek) and light cured for 10, 20, and 30 seconds with a QTH (Curing Light XL 3000, 3M Unitek) or a LED (Ortholux, 3M Unitek) light-curing unit for 5, 10, and 15 seconds. Composite resin polymerization was evaluated by Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectrophotometry and Knoop hardness number (KHN). The results were statistically analysed using analysis of variance and Tukey's multiple comparisons test (<I></I> = 0.05).</p>
<p>The highest KHN was obtained with the QTH at 30 (25.19 KHN) and 20 (24.01) seconds, which did not differ statistically, and in the LED 15 second (21.86) group. The QTH 10 second group (20.53) did not differ statistically from the QTH 20 second or the LED 5 (19.96) and 15, or 10 second (18.95) groups. According to FTIR, there was no statistical difference for the degree of conversion among the groups, QTH 10 (43.42 per cent), QTH 20 (46.12 per cent), QTH 30 (45.30 per cent), LED 10 (47.02 per cent), or LED 15 (47.24 per cent) seconds. The lowest degree of conversion was obtained for the LED 5 second group (38.97 per cent), which did not differ statistically from the QTH 10 second group.</p>
<p>Light curing with the LED resulted in a reduction of 50 per cent in the time recommended for use of the QTH light with the composite resin, Transbond XT.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cerveira, G. P., Berthold, T. B., Souto, A. A., Spohr, A. M., Marchioro, E. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 04:13:32 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ejo/cjp048</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Degree of conversion and hardness of an orthodontic resin cured with a light-emitting diode and a quartz-tungsten-halogen light]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Orthodontic Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>86</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>83</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/32/1/87?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Shear bond strength of ceramic brackets with various base designs bonded to aluminous and fluorapatite ceramics]]></title>
<link>http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/32/1/87?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This study was conducted to evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of various ceramic bracket base designs bonded to glazed aluminous (Vitadur Alpha) and fluorapatite (IPS e.max Ceram) ceramics, to examine the mode of failure, and to determine the debonding characteristics of the brackets and the ceramic surfaces after bond failure.</p>
<p>Forty ceramic discs (15 mm in diameter and 1.5 mm thick) of each ceramic were prepared and divided into four equal groups. Ten pieces of each group of different bracket bases (beads, Inspire Ice; large round pits, Crystalline IV; and irregular base, Clarity) and one group of stainless steel brackets (Optimesh XRT, control) were bonded to glazed ceramics under a 200 g load. All specimens were then subjected to SBS evaluation using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.2 mm per minute. The data were analysed using analysis of variance and Tukey's test at a significance level of 0.05. The mode of failure was examined under a stereomicroscope.</p>
<p>The results demonstrated that for Vitadur Alpha and IPS e.max Ceram, the highest SBS were found with Inspire Ice (25.1 &plusmn; 2.6 and 24.9 &plusmn; 2.1 MPa) and were significantly different than Crystalline IV (21.6 &plusmn; 1.1 and 20.9 &plusmn; 1.5 MPa), Clarity (19.6 &plusmn; 1.5 and 19.3 &plusmn; 2.3 MPa), and Optimesh XRT (14.9 &plusmn; 1.3 and 15.3 &plusmn; 2.2 MPa; <I>P</I> &lt; 0.05). Inspire Ice and Crystalline IV had 100 per cent adhesive failure while Clarity and Optimesh XRT had combination failure. The various base designs gave different SBS, but the SBS of all base designs could withstand normal orthodontic force.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kukiattrakoon, B., Samruajbenjakul, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 04:13:32 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ejo/cjp055</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Shear bond strength of ceramic brackets with various base designs bonded to aluminous and fluorapatite ceramics]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Orthodontic Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>93</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>87</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/32/1/94?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Salivary Streptococcus mutans levels in patients with conventional and self-ligating brackets]]></title>
<link>http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/32/1/94?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of bracket type (conventional and self-ligating) on the levels of <I>Streptococcus mutans</I> and total bacterial counts in whole saliva of orthodontic patients. Thirty-two male and female patients were selected using the following inclusion criteria: adolescents (mean age 13.6 years, range 11&ndash;17 years), fixed appliances in both arches, non-smoker, and no reported oral habits. Demographic and oral hygiene characteristics were determined for each subject. The patients were subdivided into two groups with random allocation of bracket type (conventional or self-ligating). An initial saliva sample was obtained before the initiation of treatment (T1) and a second sample 2&ndash;3 months following appliance bonding (T2). Salivary <I>S. mutans</I> and total bacteria were enumerated and analysed after growth in culture. The demographic and clinical characteristics of the samples were analysed with a <I>t</I>- or chi-square test, where applicable, to assess the random allocation of bracket group to participants. The results of <I>S. mutans</I> and total facultative bacterial counts were log transformed and statistically analysed with analysis of covariance with bracket (conventional versus self-ligating) as the categorical variable and initial total bacterial counts or initial <I>S. mutans</I> levels serving as the covariate.</p>
<p>No difference was found in the demographics and oral hygiene indices between the two groups, verifying the random assignment of brackets to the population sample. The levels of <I>S. mutans</I> in whole saliva of orthodontically treated patients do not seem to be significantly different between conventional and self-ligating brackets. The pre-treatment levels of <I>S. mutans</I> are significant predictors of the levels of <I>S. mutans</I> after placement of orthodontic appliances, while this was not the case for total bacterial counts.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pandis, N., Papaioannou, W., Kontou, E., Nakou, M., Makou, M., Eliades, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 04:13:32 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ejo/cjp033</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Salivary Streptococcus mutans levels in patients with conventional and self-ligating brackets]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Orthodontic Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>99</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>94</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/32/1/100?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The effect of constant height bracket placement on marginal ridge levelling using digitized models]]></title>
<link>http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/32/1/100?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Bracket placement is an important phase of orthodontic treatment. Final compensatory archwire bends or bracket repositioning may be avoided if brackets are accurately positioned at the outset, so as to correctly express their built-in prescription. The purpose of this study was to investigate the levelling of marginal ridges when a bracket placement protocol, with fixed values from the incisal edges and occlusal surfaces, was used on digitized models. A computerized tool, OrthoCAD&reg;, was used to predict the end result using virtual set-up software. The appliances used for digital simulation were 3M MBT Victory Series 0.022 inch with a 0.019 <FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT> 0.025 inch stainless steel final archwire on 42 digitized models. A paired <I>t</I>-test was used to investigate differences between the means of the pre- (T1) and post- (T2) treatment marginal ridge heights.</p>
<p>The results showed that most of the marginal ridge points studied deteriorated during digitized treatment prediction compared with T1. Statistical and clinically significant changes (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.05) were found for upper premolar and lower molar marginal ridge points. Variability in the facial contour of the teeth seemed to play an important role.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Suarez, C., Vilar, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 04:13:32 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ejo/cjp029</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The effect of constant height bracket placement on marginal ridge levelling using digitized models]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Orthodontic Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>105</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>100</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/32/1/106?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Tooth movements in foxhounds after one or two alveolar corticotomies]]></title>
<link>http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/32/1/106?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The aim of this split-mouth experimental study was to determine (1) whether corticotomy procedures increase tooth movement and (2) the effects of a second corticotomy procedure after 4 weeks on the rate of tooth movement.</p>
<p>The mandibular third and maxillary second premolars of five skeletally mature male foxhounds, approximately 2 years of age, were extracted. One randomly selected mandibular quadrant had buccal and lingual flaps and corticotomies performed around the second premolar; the other quadrant served as the control. Both maxillary quadrants had initial buccal flaps and corticotomies; one randomly selected quadrant had a second buccal flap surgery and corticotomy after 28 days. Coil springs (200 g force), along with a 0.045 mm diameter tube on a 0.040 mm diameter guiding wire, were used to move the mandibular second and maxillary third premolars. Records, including digital calliper measurements and radiographs, were taken on days 0, 10, 14, 28, 42, and 56. Multilevel statistical procedures were used to model longitudinal tooth movements.</p>
<p>The radiographic measurements initially showed increasing mandibular tooth movement rates, peaking between 22 and 25 days, and then decelerating. Total mandibular tooth movements were significantly (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.05) greater on the experimental (2.4 mm) than on the control (1.3 mm) side. The rates of maxillary tooth movement slowed over time, with significantly (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.05) more overall tooth movement on the side that had two (2.3 mm) than one (2.0 mm) corticotomy procedure.</p>
<p>Alveolar corticotomy significantly increases orthodontic tooth movement. Performing a second corticotomy procedure after 4 weeks maintained higher rates of tooth movement over a longer duration and produced greater overall tooth movement than performing just one initial corticotomy, but the difference was small.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sanjideh, P. A., Rossouw, P. E., Campbell, P. M., Opperman, L. A., Buschang, P. H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 04:13:32 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ejo/cjp070</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Tooth movements in foxhounds after one or two alveolar corticotomies]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Orthodontic Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>113</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>106</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/32/1/114?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Biological mechanisms of tooth movement]]></title>
<link>http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/32/1/114?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vandevska-Radunovic, V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 04:13:32 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ejo/cjp126</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Biological mechanisms of tooth movement]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Orthodontic Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>114</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>114</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Book Reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/32/1/114-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Current therapy in orthodontics (2010)]]></title>
<link>http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/32/1/114-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Grunheid, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 04:13:32 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ejo/cjp127</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Current therapy in orthodontics (2010)]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Orthodontic Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>115</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>114</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Book Reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/32/1/115?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Detection, assessment, diagnosis and monitoring of caries (2009)]]></title>
<link>http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/32/1/115?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pender, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 04:13:32 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ejo/cjp133</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Detection, assessment, diagnosis and monitoring of caries (2009)]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Orthodontic Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>116</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>115</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Book Reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/32/1/116?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Self-ligation in orthodontics (2009)]]></title>
<link>http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/32/1/116?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mandall, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 04:13:32 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ejo/cjp134</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Self-ligation in orthodontics (2009)]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Orthodontic Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>116</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>116</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Book Reviews</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>