<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org">
<title>The European Journal of Orthodontics - current issue</title>
<link>http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org</link>
<description>The European Journal of Orthodontics - RSS feed of current issue</description>
<prism:eIssn>1460-2210</prism:eIssn>
<prism:coverDisplayDate>December 2009</prism:coverDisplayDate>
<prism:publicationName>The European Journal of Orthodontics</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>0141-5387</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/6/565?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/6/572?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/6/578?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/6/584?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/6/590?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/6/596?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/6/613?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/6/620?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/6/625?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/6/632?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/6/638?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/6/643?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/6/647?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/6/652?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/6/658?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/6/664?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/6/665?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/6/666?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/6/666-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/6/668?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/6/669?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
</channel>

<item rdf:about="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/6/565?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Proliferation and differentiation of periodontal ligament cells following short-term tooth movement in the rat using different regimens of loading]]></title>
<link>http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/6/565?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Previous studies have indicated that periodontal ligament (PDL) cells demonstrate osteogenic potential and osteoblastic differentiation via the extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) pathway under mechanical stress <I>in vitro</I> and <I>in vivo</I>. This study aimed to further analyse this regulatory process experimentally in the rat.</p>
<p>The right upper first molars of 25 twelve-week-old male Wistar anaesthetized rats were loaded with forces in order to be moved mesially. Constant forces for 4 hours of 0.25 and 0.5 N were applied in five animals each. Furthermore, constant forces for 2 hours of 0.1 N were applied in 10 animals and afterwards, the first and second molars were permanently separated with composite. In these animals, the antagonists were sliced and five rats were killed after 1 day and five after 2 days. As a last experiment, intermittent forces of 0.1 N and 0.25 Hz were applied in five different animals for 4 hours. The untreated contralateral sides served as the control. Paraffin-embedded sections were analysed by immunohistochemistry for proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), runt-related transcription factor 2 (Runx2/Cbfa1), and phosphorylated extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (pERK1/2). Statistical analysis to determine differences between the groups was carried out using a Student's <I>t</I>-test.</p>
<p>In selected areas under tension, the proportion of pERK1/2-positive cells was increased compared with those in control teeth under all types of loading, whereas these proportions in selected areas under pressure were increased only after the application of intermittent forces. In representative areas, both under tension and pressure, the proportion of Runx2-positive cells decreased after the application of constant forces. After the application of constant forces for 4 hours in representative areas, both under tension and pressure, the proportion of PCNA-positive cells was lower than those in control teeth.</p>
<p>The involvement of pERK1/2, Runx2/cbfa-1, and PCNA in the reaction of PDL cells to different load regimens was verified.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pavlidis, D., Bourauel, C., Rahimi, A., Gotz, W., Jager, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:53:19 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ejo/cjp053</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Proliferation and differentiation of periodontal ligament cells following short-term tooth movement in the rat using different regimens of loading]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Orthodontic Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>31</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>571</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>565</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/6/572?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Influence of bisphosphonates on orthodontic tooth movement in mice]]></title>
<link>http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/6/572?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Mechanical stress such as orthodontic tooth movement induces osteoclastogenesis. Sometimes, excessive mechanical stress results in root resorption during orthodontic tooth movement. It has been reported that bisphosphonate inhibits osteoclastogenesis. Recently, there have been concerns for orthodontic patients receiving bisphosphonates. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the effect of bisphosphonates on orthodontic tooth movement and root resorption in mice.</p>
<p>A nickel-titanium (Ni-Ti) closed coil spring delivering a force of 10 g was inserted between the upper anterior alveolar bone and the first molar in 8-week-old male C57BL/6 mice. Bisphosphonate (2 &micro;g/20 &micro;l) was injected daily into a local site adjacent to the upper molar. After 12 days, the distance the tooth had moved was measured. The number of tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP)-positive cells was counted as osteoclasts in histological sections. Root resorption was assessed by scanning electron microscopy. The data were analysed with a Student's <I>t</I>-test.</p>
<p>The orthodontic appliance increased the number of osteoclasts on the pressure side and mesial movement of the first molar. Bisphosphonates reduced the amount of tooth movement and the number of osteoclasts. In addition, they also reduced root resorption on the pressure side.</p>
<p>Bisphosphonates inhibit orthodontic tooth movement and prevent root resorption during orthodontic tooth movement in mice. These results suggest that bisphosphonates might have an inhibiting effect on root resorption during orthodontic tooth movement in humans and that they may interrupt tooth movement in orthodontic patients undergoing treatment, thus altering the outcome of treatment.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fujimura, Y., Kitaura, H., Yoshimatsu, M., Eguchi, T., Kohara, H., Morita, Y., Yoshida, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:53:19 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ejo/cjp068</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Influence of bisphosphonates on orthodontic tooth movement in mice]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Orthodontic Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>31</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>577</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>572</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/6/578?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Root resorption during orthodontic tooth movements]]></title>
<link>http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/6/578?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The aim of the study was to compare the extent of maxillary incisor root resorption during different orthodontic tooth movements using three different techniques, namely the basal intrusion arch, the three component arch, and levelling of the upper dental arch with the straightwire appliance. The radiographs of 49 subjects (20 males and 29 females) with a mean age of 14.5 years were taken at two time points: in groups 1 and 2 after the levelling phase and in group 3 immediately after placement of the archwire (T1) and in all groups after a period of 6 months (T2). The amount of root resorption of the central incisors was determined at T2. The average incisor resorption was different in the three groups, with group 2 (three component arch) showing greater resorption (0.46 mm) than groups 1 (basal arch) and 3 (straightwire) of 0.26 and 0.25 mm, respectively. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) demonstrated that differences in root resorption in the three groups were not significant. Wilcoxon paired test showed that the root resorption occurring between T1 and T2 in the three groups was not significant. There was also no significant difference among the rates of resorption in the three groups. Grouping the subjects on the basis of the extent of root resorption and the biomechanics used showed differences in the percentage of subjects with the least (&lt;0.5 mm) and greatest (0.5&ndash;0.9 mm) amounts of root resorption between the three groups. This again showed that the technique of three component intrusion arch resulted in the greatest increase in root resorption.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ramanathan, C., Hofman, Z.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:53:19 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ejo/cjp058</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Root resorption during orthodontic tooth movements]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Orthodontic Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>31</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>583</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>578</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/6/584?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Tooth size discrepancy in orthodontic patients among different malocclusion groups]]></title>
<link>http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/6/584?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>An appropriate relationship of the mesiodistal (MD) widths of the maxillary and mandibular teeth favours optimal post-treatment results. The aims of this study were to determine whether there is a difference in the incidence of tooth size discrepancies among different skeletal malocclusion groups and if gender dimorphism exists.</p>
<p>The dental casts and lateral cephalometric radiographs of 301 Croatian subjects (127 males and 174 females, mean age 16.86 &plusmn; 2.93 years) were selected from a larger sample of records of the archives of the Orthodontic Department, School of Dental Medicine, University of Zagreb, Croatia. The subjects were from malocclusion groups according to Angle classification, with the corresponding skeletal characteristics. The MD dimensions of all teeth from first molar to first molar were measured on the dental casts using digital callipers. Statistical analysis was undertaken using Kolmogorov&ndash;Smirnov, <I>t</I>, and Scheff&eacute;'s tests and one-way analysis of variance.</p>
<p>A statistically significant gender difference was found in anterior ratio (<I>P</I> = 0.017). A significant difference in the overall and posterior ratio was observed between Class II and Class III subjects. There was a tendency for mandibular tooth size excess in subjects with an Angle Class III malocclusion and for maxillary tooth size excess in those with an Angle Class II malocclusion. The percentage of subjects more than 2 standard deviations from Bolton's means for anterior and overall ratios was 16.28 and 4.32, respectively.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Strujic, M., Anic-Milosevic, S., Mestrovic, S., Slaj, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:53:20 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ejo/cjp013</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Tooth size discrepancy in orthodontic patients among different malocclusion groups]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Orthodontic Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>31</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>589</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>584</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/6/590?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Comparative assessment of forces generated during simulated alignment with self-ligating and conventional brackets]]></title>
<link>http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/6/590?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The objectives of this study were to comparatively assess the magnitude and direction of forces and moments generated from different bracket systems, during the initial levelling and alignment stage of orthodontic treatment. Three types of brackets were used: Orthos2 (Ormco), Damon2 (Ormco), and In-Ovation R (GAC). The brackets were bonded on resin replicas models of a patient's crowded mandibular arch, and a 0.014 inch Damon archform CuNiTi (Ormco) wire was inserted. The model was mounted on the Orthodontic Measurement and Simulation System (OMSS) and six static measurements were taken at the initial crowded state per bracket for the lateral incisor, canine, and first premolar. A total of 10 repetitions were performed for each measurement, with new brackets and archwires used for each trial. The forces and moments generated were registered directly on the OMSS software and were statistically analyzed using a one-way analysis of variance separately for each dental arch location and force component. Group differences were further analyzed with Tukey's <I>post hoc</I> comparisons test at the 0.05 significance level.</p>
<p>The lingually inclined, crowded lateral incisor presented an extrusive and buccal movement and showed the lowest force in the vertical direction, whereas the self-ligating group of brackets generated the highest force in the buccolingual direction. The moments applied by the three bracket systems followed the general trend shown for forces; in the vertical axis, the self-ligating brackets exerted lower forces than their conventional counterpart. This was modified in the buccolingual direction where, in most instances, the self-ligating appliances applied higher moments compared with the conventional bracket. In most cases, the magnitude of forces and moments ranged between 30&ndash;70 cN and 2&ndash;6 N mm, respectively. However, maximum forces and moments developed at the lateral incisor were almost four times higher than the average.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pandis, N., Eliades, T., Bourauel, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:53:20 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ejo/cjn107</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Comparative assessment of forces generated during simulated alignment with self-ligating and conventional brackets]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Orthodontic Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>31</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>595</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>590</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/6/596?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The adaptive response of jaw muscles to varying functional demands]]></title>
<link>http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/6/596?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Jaw muscles are versatile entities that are able to adapt their anatomical characteristics, such as size, cross-sectional area, and fibre properties, to altered functional demands. The dynamic nature of muscle fibres allows them to change their phenotype to optimize the required contractile function while minimizing energy use. Changes in these anatomical parameters are associated with changes in neuromuscular activity as the pattern of muscle activation by the central nervous system plays an important role in the modulation of muscle properties.</p>
<p>This review summarizes the adaptive response of jaw muscles to various stimuli or perturbations in the orofacial system and addresses general changes in muscles as they adapt, specific adaptive changes in jaw muscles under various physiologic and pathologic conditions, and their adaptive response to non-surgical and surgical therapeutic interventions.</p>
<p>Although the jaw muscles are used concertedly in the masticatory system, their adaptive changes are not always uniform and vary with the nature, intensity, and duration of the stimulus. In general, stretch, increases neuromuscular activity, and resistance training result in hypertrophy, elicits increases in mitochondrial content and cross-sectional area of the fibres, and may change the fibre-type composition of the muscle towards a larger percentage of slow-type fibres. In contrast, changes in the opposite direction occur when neuromuscular activity is reduced, the muscle is immobilized in a shortened position, or paralysed. The broad range of stimuli that affect the properties of jaw muscles might help explain the large variability in the anatomical and physiological characteristics found among individuals, muscles, and muscle portions.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Grunheid, T., Langenbach, G. E. J., Korfage, J. A. M., Zentner, A., van Eijden, T. M. G. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:53:20 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ejo/cjp093</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The adaptive response of jaw muscles to varying functional demands]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Orthodontic Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>31</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>612</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>596</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/6/613?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A cross-sectional study on the relationship between craniofacial morphology and the coronoid process]]></title>
<link>http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/6/613?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Although there have been some reports on the relationship between craniofacial morphology and the activity of the temporal muscle attached to the coronoid process, such relationship is still unclear. The aim of the present study was therefore to investigate the relationship between the coronoid process and overall craniofacial morphology using lateral cephalograms of 60 female subjects (mean age 9.6 years) without mandibular deviation. Statistical testing was undertaken using stepwise regression analysis.</p>
<p>Anterior coronoid marginal depth correlated negatively (<I>r</I> = 0.71) with gonial angle, SNA, and overjet. The coronoid angle also correlated negatively (<I>r</I> = 0.86) with both the vertical and horizontal lengths from sella to the coronoid tip as well as with the horizontal length from sella to the posterior ramus margin. Furthermore, the coronoid length correlated positively (<I>r</I> = 0.61) with the coronoid angle and the anterior coronoid marginal depth. The coronoid width was also positively (<I>r</I> = 0.69) correlated with overbite.</p>
<p>Coronoid process morphology is related not only to mandibular morphology and position but also to maxillary position and the dental relationship in the anterior region. It therefore seems clear that coronoid process morphology might be related to temporal muscle functioning and its associated craniofacial morphological measurements.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Torisu, T., Yamada, K., Fukui, T., Yamaki, M., Nakamura, J., Saito, I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:53:20 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ejo/cjp043</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A cross-sectional study on the relationship between craniofacial morphology and the coronoid process]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Orthodontic Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>31</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>619</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>613</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/6/620?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Comparative evaluation of the breaking strength of a simple mobile mandibular advancement splint]]></title>
<link>http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/6/620?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Mandibular advancement splints (MASs) are used to advance the mandible forward in patients with sleep-disordered breathing. The conventional rigid MAS restricts the movement of the mandible, and this immobility sometimes produces discomfort, including temporomandibular disorders. A simple method for fabricating a mobile MAS was devised, using a connector made from a polyethylene toothed belt, with the intention of making the MAS more comfortable.</p>
<p>The experimental connector is easily constructed, inexpensive, and small enough for use as an intraoral MAS. To evaluate durability, the axial and diagonal tensile breaking strengths of the MAS, using high- or low-density polyethylene (HDPE or LDPE) lateral toothed belts, were compared with those of a conventional mobile MAS (Silensor). The values were compared by factorial analysis of variances and <I>post hoc</I> Scheffe's <I>S</I> multiple comparison intervals, with the value of statistical significance set at alpha = 0.05. In addition, the experimental LDPE connectors were clinically tested in 30 patients (23 males and 7 females aged 19&ndash;71 years) and evaluated.</p>
<p>Compared with the Silensor, the experimental MAS exhibited sufficient breaking strength, especially when a diagonal tensile load was applied to mimic mandibular lateral translation. When examining the clinical evaluation between 3 and 4 months after insertion, no damage or failure was observed.</p>
<p>The experimental connecting system may have clinical applications. To make the connector stronger for clinical use, HDPE should be used.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tanoue, N., Nagano, K., Yanamoto, S., Mizuno, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:53:20 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ejo/cjp040</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Comparative evaluation of the breaking strength of a simple mobile mandibular advancement splint]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Orthodontic Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>31</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>624</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>620</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/6/625?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Initial forces generated by three types of thermoplastic appliances on an upper central incisor during tipping]]></title>
<link>http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/6/625?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The force properties of thermoformed appliances have not been systematically investigated. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to quantify the forces delivered by thermoplastic appliances manufactured from three different materials, with the same thickness, on a central upper incisor, during tipping.</p>
<p>Five identical appliances were manufactured from three different materials all with a thickness of 1.0 mm (Ideal Clear&reg;, Erkodur&reg;, and Biolon&reg;). For measuring the forces, an isolated measuring tooth, as part of a standardized resin model incorporated in a newly developed measuring device, was tipped in nine <f><inline-fig>
<link locator="eorthocjp047fx1_ht"></inline-fig></f> arc minute (<f><inline-fig>
<link locator="eorthocjp047fx2_ht"></inline-fig></f>degree) steps, from 0 to <f><inline-fig>
<link locator="eorthocjp047fx3_ht"></inline-fig></f> degrees in the vestibular and palatal directions around a rotational axis through the virtual apex, after positioning an appliance on the model. For statistical analysis, the force components <I>Fx</I>/tipping and <I>Fz</I>/intrusion at a displacement of &plusmn;0.151 mm from the incisor edge were determined. Means and standard deviations (SDs) were calculated. The Kruskal&ndash;Wallis test for overall effects and the Wilcoxon two-sample test for individual group pairings were used (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.05 significance level).</p>
<p>The mean <I>Fx</I> forces ranged from &ndash;2.82 N (SD 0.62) to 5.42 N (SD 0.56). The mean <I>Fz</I> forces were between &ndash;0.14 N (SD 0.52) and &ndash;2.3 N (SD 0.43). The highest intrusive forces were measured during vestibular displacement of the measuring tooth. The forces delivered by the Biolon&reg; appliance were found to be much greater (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.01) than those of the other materials.</p>
<p>The forces delivered by the materials investigated were mostly higher than those stated in the literature.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hahn, W., Fialka-Fricke, J., Dathe, H., Fricke-Zech, S., Zapf, A., Gruber, R., Kubein-Meesenburg, D., Sadat-Khonsari, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:53:20 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ejo/cjp047</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Initial forces generated by three types of thermoplastic appliances on an upper central incisor during tipping]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Orthodontic Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>31</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>631</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>625</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/6/632?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Non-syndromic concomitant hypodontia and supernumerary teeth in an orthodontic population]]></title>
<link>http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/6/632?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The simultaneous occurrence of hypodontia and supernumerary teeth in the same individual is termed &lsquo;concomitant hypo-hyperodontia&rsquo; (CHH). There appears to be a correlation between CHH and some syndromes, but this anomaly is very rare in the general population. The aim of this study was to investigate the frequency of CHH in a large sample of non-syndromic orthodontic patients. The records of 2108 consecutive non-syndromic orthodontic patients aged from 7 to 16 years were examined retrospectively. Every patient had at least one panoramic radiograph. When the diagnosis of hypodontia and/or hyperodontia was made in a child under 10 years of age, a second panoramic film was taken 2&ndash;4 years later. Statistical analysis of the data was undertaken using a chi-square test.</p>
<p>Single or multiple hypodontia was diagnosed in 137 patients (6.5 per cent), 62 males and 75 females. One or more supernumerary teeth were found in 42 patients (2 per cent), 22 males and 20 females. CHH was diagnosed in seven subjects (0.33 per cent), four males and three females. In the CHH subpopulation, the total number of absent and supernumerary teeth was nine and eight, respectively. Hypodontia always occurred in the permanent dentition and was more frequent in the mandible than in the maxilla (four versus three teeth). Supernumerary teeth were more frequent in the permanent than in the primary dentition (six versus two teeth). Five supernumeraries were located in the maxilla and three in the mandible.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Varela, M., Arrieta, P., Ventureira, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:53:20 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ejo/cjp046</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Non-syndromic concomitant hypodontia and supernumerary teeth in an orthodontic population]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Orthodontic Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>31</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>637</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>632</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/6/638?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Influence of lingual orthodontic therapy on microbial parameters and periodontal status in adults]]></title>
<link>http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/6/638?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Insertion of fixed orthodontic appliances can induce an increase in oral biofilm and thereby cause inflammation of the periodontal tissues. The purpose of this study was to perform a longitudinal analysis of clinical and microbial parameters after insertion of lingual brackets.</p>
<p>Bleeding on probing (BOP), plaque index (PI), and pocket probing depth (PPD) were measured in 10 adults (8 females and 2 males, aged 29.0 &plusmn; 4.7 years) who received treatment with custom-made lingual appliances (Incognito/iBraces) before (T<SUB>0</SUB>) and 3 months after beginning of treatment (T<SUB>1</SUB>). No supportive dental prophylaxis was undertaken. In addition, a 16S rRNA-based polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method was used to detect <I>Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans</I> (Aa) and <I>Porphyromonas gingivalis</I> (Pg) in the crevicular fluid. A Wilcoxon test was used to compare clinical parameters at the buccal (control) and lingual sites between T<SUB>0</SUB> and T<SUB>1</SUB>.</p>
<p>At T<SUB>0</SUB>, BOP was 12.4 &plusmn; 8.2 per cent, PPD 2.1 &plusmn; 0.3 mm, and PI 0.1 &plusmn; 0.2 at the buccal sites and at T<SUB>1</SUB> 14.3 &plusmn; 8.1 per cent, 2.1 &plusmn; 0.2 mm and 0.1 &plusmn; 0.2, respectively. At the lingual sites, BOP was 22.2 &plusmn; 19.0 per cent, PPD 2.3 &plusmn; 0.3 mm, and PI 0.1 &plusmn; 0.2 at T<SUB>0</SUB> and at T<SUB>1</SUB> 56.2 &plusmn; 31.6 per cent, 2.9 &plusmn; 0.3 mm, and 1.2 &plusmn; 1.1, respectively. Differences between T<SUB>0</SUB> and T<SUB>1</SUB> were significant for clinical parameters only at the lingual sites. Aa was found in five patients at baseline and in four at T<SUB>1</SUB>, whereas Pg was found in one patient at T<SUB>0</SUB> and in two at T<SUB>1</SUB>.</p>
<p>Insertion of fixed lingual appliances without supportive dental prophylaxis induced a worsening of clinical parameters restricted to the lingual sites, whereas the relative prevalence of Aa and Pg remained unchanged.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Demling, A., Demling, C., Schwestka-Polly, R., Stiesch, M., Heuer, W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:53:20 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ejo/cjp064</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Influence of lingual orthodontic therapy on microbial parameters and periodontal status in adults]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Orthodontic Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>31</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>642</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>638</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/6/643?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[In vitro evaluation of the frictional forces between brackets and archwire with three passive self-ligating brackets]]></title>
<link>http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/6/643?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The aim of this <I>in vitro</I> study was to evaluate the frictional forces between bracket and archwire that included three passive self-ligating brackets (Damon SL2 SDS). The brackets were individually bonded to a brass mount using a preformed 0.021 <FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT> 0.025 inch stainless steel wire jig in order to exclude adverse tipping or torsion. The central bracket was positioned 1 mm higher than the others, in order that the three brackets were vertically unaligned. Thirty-six similar set-ups including in total 108 brackets were investigated using the same wire: copper (nickel&ndash;titanium) 0.014 inches. A testing machine was designed and constructed to measure the frictional forces between the wire and the three-bracket set-up. Twelve set-ups were tested to measure kinetic frictional forces between the wire and unaligned passive self-ligating brackets used in the closed position. The frictional properties of two sets of 12 three-bracket set-ups (control) were tested and measured with an open slide and conventional ligation. A stainless steel ligature wire was used in the former, while elastomeric modules were employed in the latter.</p>
<p>One-way analysis of variance showed a significant effect of ligation mode on the frictional properties of the three-bracket set-ups (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.001). <I>Post hoc</I> pairwise comparison showed that the frictional forces arising from passive self-ligation were significantly lower (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.01) than those resulting from elastic ligation. The same result was achieved when comparing self-ligation and metallic ligation (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.01). No significant difference was found when comparing elastic and metallic ligation.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cordasco, G., Farronato, G., Festa, F., Nucera, R., Parazzoli, E., Grossi, G. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:53:20 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ejo/cjp054</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[In vitro evaluation of the frictional forces between brackets and archwire with three passive self-ligating brackets]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Orthodontic Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>31</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>646</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>643</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/6/647?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Microleakage between composite-wire and composite-enamel interfaces of flexible spiral wire retainers. Part 1: comparison of three composites]]></title>
<link>http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/6/647?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The aim of this investigation was to test the hypothesis that there is no difference in microleakage between composite&ndash;enamel and composite&ndash;wire interfaces, when different composites are used. Forty-five freshly extracted human mandibular incisors separated into three groups were used in the study. Multi-stranded 0.0215 inch diameter wire was bonded to enamel using two conventional (Transbond XT and Transbond LR) and a flowable (Venus Flow) orthodontic composite. The specimens were sealed with nail varnish, stained with 0.5 per cent basic fuchsine for 24 hours, sectioned and examined under a stereomicroscope, and scored for microleakage at the composite&ndash;enamel and composite&ndash;wire interfaces from the mesial and distal margins. Statistical analysis was performed using Kruskal&ndash;Wallis and Mann&ndash;Whitney <I>U</I>-tests with a Bonferroni correction.</p>
<p>Little or no microleakage was observed between the composite&ndash;enamel interfaces for the three investigated composites, and any difference was not statistically significant. However, statistically significant differences were found between microleakage at the composite&ndash;wire interface for both the conventional and flowable composite groups (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.001). Flowable composite showed the highest leakage (mean: 4.8 &plusmn; 0.8 mm), while Transbond XT (mean: 0.5 &plusmn; 0.3 mm) and Transbond LR (mean: 1.1 &plusmn; 1.2 mm) showed significantly lower and comparable results. The amount of microleakage at the wire&ndash;composite interface was significantly greater than that at the enamel&ndash;composite interface of flexible spiral wire retainers (FSWRs). The null hypothesis is therefore rejected. Flowable composites may not be appropriate for bonding FSWRs.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Uysal, T., Baysal, A., Usumez, S., Ulker, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:53:20 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ejo/cjp038</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Microleakage between composite-wire and composite-enamel interfaces of flexible spiral wire retainers. Part 1: comparison of three composites]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Orthodontic Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>31</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>651</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>647</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/6/652?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Microleakage between composite-wire and composite-enamel interfaces of flexible spiral wire retainers. Part 2: comparison of amorphous calcium phosphate-containing adhesive with conventional lingual retainer composite]]></title>
<link>http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/6/652?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that there is no difference in the microleakage values of a newly developed amorphous calcium phosphate (ACP)-containing adhesive and a conventional lingual retainer composite at the composite&ndash;enamel and composite&ndash;wire interfaces of flexible spiral wire retainers (FSWRs). Sixty freshly extracted human mandibular incisors separated into three equal groups were used in this study. Multi-stranded 0.0215 inch diameter wire was bonded to enamel using conventional orthodontic adhesive (Transbond LR, 3M Unitek) and ACP-containing composite (Aegis Ortho, Harry J. Bosworth Co.), with or without the use of a primer. The specimens were sealed with nail varnish, stained with 0.5 per cent basic fuchsine for 24 hours, sectioned and examined under a stereomicroscope, and scored for microleakage at the composite&ndash;enamel and composite&ndash;wire interfaces from the mesial and distal margins. Statistical analyses were performed with Kruskal&ndash;Wallis and Mann&ndash;Whitney <I>U</I>-tests with a Bonferroni correction.</p>
<p>Little or no microleakage was observed between the composite&ndash;enamel interface for any of the three groups, and any difference was not statistically significant. The amount of microleakage at the wire&ndash;composite interface was higher than that at the enamel&ndash;composite interface. Multiple comparison testing showed statistically significant differences in microleakage between Transbond LR and the ACP-containing adhesive used with primer at the composite&ndash;enamel and composite&ndash;wire interfaces (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.001). ACP-containing adhesive used with primer showed the highest microleakage scores at the composite&ndash;enamel (mean: 0.39 &plusmn; 0.42 mm) and composite&ndash;wire (mean: 1.66 &plusmn; 0.47 mm) interfaces. The hypothesis is rejected. The ACP-containing composite used with or without primer showed significantly higher leakage at the composite&ndash;wire interface, while conventional lingual retainer composite showed lower microleakage scores.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Uysal, T., Ulker, M., Baysal, A., Usumez, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:53:20 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ejo/cjp039</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Microleakage between composite-wire and composite-enamel interfaces of flexible spiral wire retainers. Part 2: comparison of amorphous calcium phosphate-containing adhesive with conventional lingual retainer composite]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Orthodontic Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>31</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>657</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>652</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/6/658?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Bond strengths of an antibacterial monomer-containing adhesive system applied with and without acid etching for lingual retainer bonding]]></title>
<link>http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/6/658?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The aim of this study was to test the null hypothesis that there is no significant difference in bond strength and failure site location of composite bonded to etched and unetched enamel with an antibacterial monomer-containing adhesive and a conventional lingual retainer adhesive system. The crowns of 60 extracted lower human incisors were mounted in acrylic resin leaving the lingual surface of the crowns parallel to the base of the moulds. The teeth were randomly divided into three equal groups: two experimental and a control. Conventional lingual retainer composite (Transbond LR) and antibacterial monomer-containing adhesive (Clearfil Protect Bond), with or without prior etching, were applied to the lingual surface of the teeth by packing the material into cylindrical plastic matrices (Ultradent) with an internal diameter of 2.34 mm and a height of 3 mm to simulate lingual retainer bonding. The shear bond data were analysed using analysis of variance and Tukey&rsquo;s tests. Fracture modes were analysed by chi-square test.</p>
<p>Statistical analysis showed that the bond strengths of the control (Transbond LR, mean: 24.77 &plusmn; 9.25 MPa) and Clearfil Protect Bond with etching, (mean: 20.24 &plusmn; 8.5 MPa) were significantly higher than Clearfil Protect Bond without etching, (mean: 12.56 &plusmn; 6.93 MPa). In general, a greater percentage of the fractures were adhesive, at the tooth&ndash;composite interface (60&ndash;65 per cent). No statistically significant difference was found among the groups. The hypothesis is thus rejected. Within the limits of this <I>in vitro</I> model, antibacterial monomer-containing self-etch adhesive with acid etching did not significantly affect shear bond strength when compared with the control. However, the same adhesive used without acid etching resulted in a significant decrease in bond strength.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ulker, M., Uysal, T., Ramoglu, S. I., Ucar, F. I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:53:20 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ejo/cjp037</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Bond strengths of an antibacterial monomer-containing adhesive system applied with and without acid etching for lingual retainer bonding]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Orthodontic Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>31</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>663</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>658</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/6/664?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Bernard G. Sarnat. 20th century plastic surgeon and biological scientist (2008)]]></title>
<link>http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/6/664?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Meikle, M. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:53:20 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ejo/cjp096</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Bernard G. Sarnat. 20th century plastic surgeon and biological scientist (2008)]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Orthodontic Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>31</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>664</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>664</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Book Reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/6/665?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Clinical dental medicine 2020 (2009)]]></title>
<link>http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/6/665?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Power, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:53:20 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ejo/cjp097</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Clinical dental medicine 2020 (2009)]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Orthodontic Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>31</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>665</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>665</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Book Reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/6/666?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Color atlas of cone beam volumetric imaging for dental applications (2009)]]></title>
<link>http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/6/666?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Slattery, D. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:53:20 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ejo/cjp109</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Color atlas of cone beam volumetric imaging for dental applications (2009)]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Orthodontic Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>31</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>666</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>666</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Book Reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/6/666-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Biocompatibility of dental materials (2009)]]></title>
<link>http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/6/666-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jones, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:53:20 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ejo/cjp110</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Biocompatibility of dental materials (2009)]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Orthodontic Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>31</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>667</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>666</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Book Reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/6/668?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Temporary anchorage devices in orthodontics (2008)]]></title>
<link>http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/6/668?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeremiah, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:53:20 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ejo/cjp111</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Temporary anchorage devices in orthodontics (2008)]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Orthodontic Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>31</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>668</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>668</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Book Reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/6/669?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Erratum]]></title>
<link>http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/6/669?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:53:20 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ejo/cjp112</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Erratum]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Orthodontic Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>31</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>669</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>669</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Erratum</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>