The European Journal of Orthodontics Advance Access published online on May 5, 2006
The European Journal of Orthodontics, doi:10.1093/ejo/cjl003
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Medicine, Kanazawa University, Japan
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. The rigid-body spring model (RBSM) theory was incorporated into a model as a discrete method for analysing problems of limit, such as the stress distribution on the condyle. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the two-dimensional RBSM for determining stress on the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) in patients after orthognathic surgery. Thirty-two patients (five males and 27 females, mean age 21.4 ± 4.9 years) with mandibular prognathism underwent bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) and setback; 48 subjects were recruited as controls. Anatomical landmarks were traced from pre- and post-operative lateral cephalograms and the information was processed using the Fortran analysis program. The force vector on the condyle, its degree, its direction, and the displacement co-ordinates (x, y) and rotation ( When muscular power was assumed to be 1, the post-operative degree of the force vector was higher than the pre-operative value (P < 0.05). The X co-ordinate, x, and rotation, The results suggest that the degree and direction of the force vector and the resulting displacement co-ordinates can be used as parameters in a surgical model. The RBSM may also be useful in evaluating the pre- and post-operative skeletal morphology of jaw deformities.
Article
The change of stress distribution on the condyle after mandibular setback surgery
Koichiro Ueki 1 *,
Kiyomasa Nakagawa 1,
Shigeyuki Takatsuka 1,
and
Etsuhide Yamamoto 1
Koichiro Ueki, E-mail: kueki{at}med.kanazawa-u.ac.jp
![]()
Abstract
) at the gonial angle were calculated.
, of the displacement vector in the pre-operative patients with mandibular prognathism were significantly higher than those in the control subjects (P < 0.05). There were still significant differences between the displacement values post-operatively between the patients and controls (P < 0.05).![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?