Skip Navigation

The European Journal of Orthodontics 1986 8(3):149-151; doi:10.1093/ejo/8.3.149
© 1986 by European Orthodontic Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Houston, W. J. B.
Right arrow Articles by Sherriff, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Houston, W. J. B.
Right arrow Articles by Sherriff, M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Sources of error in measurements from cephalometric radiographs

W. J. B. Houston*,, R. E. Maher, D. McElroy and M. Sherriff**

* Department of Orthodontics and Children's Dentistry Guy's Hospital (Univ. of Lond), United Kingdom
** Department of Dental Materials UMDS Guy's Hospital (Univ. of Lond), United Kingdom

Professor W. J. B. Houston, United Medical and Dental Schools of Guy's, and St Thomas's, Department of Orthodontics and Children's, Dentistry Floor 22 Guy's Tower, London Bridge SE1 9RT

Radiographic and tracing errors in cephalometric measurements were studied using a nested analysis of variance on tracings of duplicate cephalometric radiographs of 24 subjects. Tracing errors reflected the difficulties of landmark identification while radiographic errors were small enough to be disregarded.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Eur J OrthodHome page
T. Uysal, A. Baysal, and A. Yagci
Evaluation of speed, repeatability, and reproducibility of digital radiography with manual versus computer-assisted cephalometric analyses
Eur J Orthod, October 1, 2009; 31(5): 523 - 528.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Dentomaxillofac RadiolHome page
H. Duarte, R Vieck, D. Siqueira, F Angelieri, S Bommarito, G Dalben, and E. Sannomiya
Effect of image compression of digital lateral cephalograms on the reproducibility of cephalometric points
Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., September 1, 2009; 38(6): 393 - 400.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Eur J OrthodHome page
E. Celik, O. Polat-Ozsoy, and T. U. Toygar Memikoglu
Comparison of cephalometric measurements with digital versus conventional cephalometric analysis
Eur J Orthod, June 1, 2009; 31(3): 241 - 246.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Eur J OrthodHome page
J. Naoumova and R. Lindman
A comparison of manual traced images and corresponding scanned radiographs digitally traced
Eur J Orthod, June 1, 2009; 31(3): 247 - 253.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Eur J OrthodHome page
O. Polat-Ozsoy, A. Gokcelik, and T. U. Toygar Memikoglu
Differences in cephalometric measurements: a comparison of digital versus hand-tracing methods
Eur J Orthod, June 1, 2009; 31(3): 254 - 259.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Eur J OrthodHome page
H Devreese, G De Pauw, G Van Maele, A. Kuijpers-Jagtman, and L Dermaut
Stability of upper incisor inclination changes in Class II division 2 patients
Eur J Orthod, June 1, 2007; 29(3): 314 - 320.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Eur J OrthodHome page
K. Sayinsu, F. Isik, G. Trakyali, and T. Arun
An evaluation of the errors in cephalometric measurements on scanned cephalometric images and conventional tracings
Eur J Orthod, February 1, 2007; 29(1): 105 - 108.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Orthod.Home page
P. J. Turner and S. Weerakone
An Evaluation of the Reproducibility of Landmark Identification Using Scanned Cephalometric Images
J. Orthod., September 1, 2001; 28(3): 221 - 230.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.