Skip Navigation


The European Journal of Orthodontics Advance Access originally published online on February 25, 2009
The European Journal of Orthodontics 2009 31(3):294-299; doi:10.1093/ejo/cjn116
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
31/3/294    most recent
cjn116v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lux, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Niekusch, U.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lux, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Niekusch, U.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Orthodontic Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Occlusal status and prevalence of occlusal malocclusion traits among 9-year-old schoolchildren

Christopher J. Lux*, Britta Dücker*, Maria Pritsch**, Gerda Komposch* and Uwe Niekusch***

* Department of Orthodontics
** Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, University of Heidelberg
*** Community Dental Service, Rhein-Neckar-Kreis, Germany

Address for correspondence Professor Christopher J. Lux, Department of Orthodontics, University of Heidelberg, lm Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, GermanyE-mail: christopher.lux{at}med.uni-heidelberg.de


   Abstract

The aim of this study was to provide detailed information concerning clinically relevant occlusal traits and the prevalence of occlusal anomalies in an orthodontically relevant period of dental development. Four hundred and ninety-four German schoolchildren (237 males and 257 females), median age 9 years, were orthodontically examined. Overjet and overbite were measured to the nearest 0.5 mm, and sagittal molar relationships were registered clinically to the nearest quarter unit. In addition, crossbites, scissor bites, and midline displacements were evaluated. Descriptive statistics was complemented by testing gender differences and differences between groups with Class I and Class II anomalies (Mann–Whitney U-test) as well as a statistical evaluation of differences between the three dental stages (Kruskal–Wallis test).

Overjet exhibited an extreme range between –2 and 12 mm (median values 3–3.5 mm). An increased overjet was more prevalent than a reduced or reverse overjet, and a severely increased overjet greater than 6 mm was a common finding affecting around 5–10 per cent of the children. Similarly, overbite showed considerable variations of between –1 and 9 mm (medians 3–3.5 mm) and males exhibited a significantly larger overbite than females. In Class II malocclusion subjects, overbite was significantly enlarged (on average between 0.5 and 1 mm) when compared with those with a Class I malocclusion. Traumatic contact of the gingiva affected every 14th child. A Class II molar relationship of three-quarter units or more was a frequent finding affecting more than one child in five. In addition, at 9 years of age, 3 per cent of the children exhibited a Class III molar relationship of at least a half unit. The wide range of orthodontically relevant occlusal traits found in the present study underlines the need for orthodontic screening at 9 years of age (or earlier).


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.