Skip Navigation

The European Journal of Orthodontics 2009 31(3):221-231; doi:10.1093/ejo/cjp032
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Milne, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Meikle, M. C.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Milne, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Meikle, M. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Orthodontic Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Induction of osteopenia during experimental tooth movement in the rat: alveolar bone remodelling and the mechanostat theory

Trudy J. Milne*, Ionut Ichim*, Bhavik Patel*, Andrew McNaughton** and Murray C. Meikle*,***

* Faculty of Dentistry
** Department of Anatomy and Structural Biology, University of Otago, New Zealand
*** Faculty of Dentistry, National University of Singapore, Singapore

Address for correspondence Professor Murray C. Meikle, Faculty of Dentistry, National University of Singapore, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Road, Singapore 119074, E-mail: pndmcm{at}nus.edu.sg


   Abstract

Increases in bone strains above a certain threshold have a positive effect on bone mass, whereas reductions in strain magnitude lead to bone loss and osteopenia; the term ‘mechanostat’ has been introduced to describe this tissue-level negative feedback mechanism. The mechanobiology of bone and particularly alveolar bone is poorly understood, and whether the mechanostat theory has any relevance to explaining the osseous changes that occur during orthodontic tooth movement remains unclear. To investigate the relationship further, an expansile force of 0.2 N was applied to the maxillary molars of 36, 6-week-old Wistar rats by helical coil springs. The animals were sacrificed at 1, 2, 4, and 8 days and the tissue response analyzed by histological, biochemical, and finite element (FE) methods. Differences between groups were determined by Student's t-test (two-tailed).

The appliance produced an increase in the intermolar width averaging 0.5 mm after 8 days. Tetracycline uptake in the control rats suggested a rapid turnover of bone in both the interradicular domain and the bone–periodontal ligament interface. In the experimental group, however, incorporation of tetracycline into the interradicular domain was reduced and conventional histology revealed evidence of bone loss and osteopenia, in both the experimental and a group of sham-treated positive controls (with inactive, annealed springs). Serum alkaline phosphatase declined significantly in both experimental and sham-treated groups over the 8-day time course, indicating decreased bone formation. Serum acid phosphatase also declined, suggesting a concomitant decrease in bone resorption. Three-dimensional FE analysis of the stresses generated in the bone following occlusal (2 N) and orthodontic loading showed that the orthodontic force created a constant loading condition shielding some areas of bone from mechanical stress. Areas of low mechanical stimulation were coincident with sites of bone loss observed histologically, while bone mass was preserved in areas with higher levels of loading.

These findings suggest that (1) the osteopenia resulted from stress shielding of the interradicular bone by the appliance, and a consequent reduction in occlusal loading below the critical threshold required for maintaining normal osseous architecture and (2) the mechanostat model can be employed to explain, at least in part, the response of the bone to orthodontic loading.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.