Skip Navigation

The European Journal of Orthodontics 2008 30(6):552-557; doi:10.1093/ejo/cjn054
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jung, B. A.
Right arrow Articles by Wehrbein, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jung, B. A.
Right arrow Articles by Wehrbein, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Orthodontic Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Bone-to-implant contact of orthodontic implants in humans—a histomorphometric investigation

Britta A. Jung*, Faruk Yildizhan** and Heinrich Wehrbein*

* Department of Orthodontics, University of Mainz, Germany
** Department of Orthodontics, University of Aachen, Germany

Address for correspondence Dr Britta A. Jung, Department of Orthodontics, University Hospital Mainz, Augustusplatz 2, 55131 Mainz, Germany. E-mail:brjung{at}uni-mainz.de


   Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the percentage of direct bone-to-implant contact (BIC) of orthodontic anchorage implants (Orthosystem) after active orthodontic treatment.

Twenty orthodontic implants (diameter, 3.3 mm; length, 4 or 6 mm) were inserted for orthodontic anchorage in different anatomical regions of 18 adult patients (nine males, nine females) aged 18–63 years. Fifteen implants (one per patient) were placed in the mid-palatal area, one implant (one patient) in the retromolar area of the mandible, one in the retromolar area and the mid-palatal area (one patient), and two (bilaterally, one patient) in the zygomatic area. The duration of the unloaded healing period was 3 months while that of the loading period ranged from 9 to 22 months. Subsequently, the implants were removed with a bone drill and prepared for histological and histomorphometric evaluation. Histological analysis was performed using the ground thin-section technology. Outcome variables were clinical implant survival and BIC rates. Statistical evaluation included analysis of the measured values, minimum, maximum, means, and standard deviations of the means.

The mean percentage of direct BIC at the endosseous implant body was 68.22 per cent for the palatal implants [n = 16, standard deviation (SD): 14.35], 64.85 per cent (SD: 2.89) for the retromolar implants (n = 2), and 60.45 per cent (SD: 0.49) for the zygomatic implants (n = 2). A relatively high BIC was registered at the surfaces of the loaded implants. This finding might favour the maintenance of osseointegration during orthodontic loading of length-reduced implants.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.