Skip Navigation

The European Journal of Orthodontics 2007 29(5):530-537; doi:10.1093/ejo/cjm063
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Martin, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by McKinney, T. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Martin, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by McKinney, T. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Orthodontic Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

The impact of buccal corridors on smile attractiveness

Adam J. Martin, Peter H. Buschang, Jimmy C. Boley, Reginald W. Taylor and Thomas W. McKinney

Department of Orthodontics, Baylor College of Dentistry, Texas A&M Health Sciences Center, Dallas, Texas

Address for correspondence Professor Peter H. Buschang, Department of Orthodontics, Baylor College of Dentistry, 3302 Gaston Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75246, USA, E-mail: phbuschang{at}bcd.tamhsc.edu


   Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the impact of various sized buccal corridors (BCs) on smile attractiveness. One female smiling photograph, displaying first molar to first molar (M1–M1), was digitally altered to produce (1) smiles that filled 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100 per cent of the oral aperture; (2) second premolar to second premolar smiles (PM2–PM2) that filled 84, 88, 92, and 96 per cent of the oral aperture; and (3) smiles with asymmetrical BC that filled 88, 90, 94, and 96 per cent of the oral aperture. The 18 smiles produced were evaluated by 82 orthodontists (70 males and 12 females) and 94 laypeople (40 males and 54 females). Paired t-tests were used to evaluate differences within the orthodontist and laypeople groups: independent t-tests were used to compare the two groups. The effect of age and gender on the ratings was evaluated by two-way analysis of variance.

Orthodontists and laypeople rated smiles with small BCs as significantly (P < 0.05) more attractive than those with large BCs. Orthodontists rated M1–M1 smiles as more attractive than PM2–PM2 smiles, whereas laypeople preferred PM2–PM2 smiles. Orthodontists rated only two of eight asymmetrical smiles as less attractive than would be expected for symmetrical smiles with similar arch widths; laypeople did not rate any asymmetrical smiles as less attractive than would be expected. Rater age and gender did not significantly influence the impact of BCs on smile attractiveness.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.