The European Journal of Orthodontics Advance Access originally published online on April 28, 2006
The European Journal of Orthodontics 2006 28(3):269-273; doi:10.1093/ejo/cji112
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Estimating arch length discrepancy through Little's Irregularity Index for epidemiological use
* Department of Social Dentistry, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru and
** Department of Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
Address for correspondence Dr Carlos Flores-Mir, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Room 4051A, Dentistry/Pharmacy Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2N8. E-mail: carlosflores{at}ualberta.ca
The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic capability of Little's Irregularity Index (LII) in order to estimate the arch length discrepancy (ALD) in a dental arch. Dental casts with a full permanent dentition, excluding third molars, from 200 12- to-16-year-old schoolchildren from a representative high school located in Lima, Peru, were used. Incisal irregularity was measured using the LII, whereas ALD was calculated as the difference between available and required space in each dental arch anterior to the first permanent molars. The receiveroperator characteristic (ROC) curve was used to contrast the LII with three different dichotomized ALDs and locate optimized cut-off points.
Correlation between ALD and LII was 0.68 (P < 0.001). According to ROC curves, LIIs of 2.45, 4.00, and 4.55 mm were the optimized cut-off points to estimate negative ALDs higher than 0, 3, and 6 mm, respectively. LII's highest diagnostic capability was found for estimating negative ALD greater than 3 mm with a sensibility of 0.78 and a specificity of 0.76.
Based on the present findings, LII could potentially be used in epidemiological surveys as a valid and less time-consuming measurement of crowding compared with ALD; however, further studies are needed to test the reliability of this approach in field settings.