Skip Navigation

The European Journal of Orthodontics 2000 22(5):509-518; doi:10.1093/ejo/22.5.509
© 2000 by European Orthodontic Society
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Birkeland, K
Right arrow Articles by Wisth, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Birkeland, K
Right arrow Articles by Wisth, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Relationship between occlusion and satisfaction with dental appearance in orthodontically treated and untreated groups. A longitudinal study

K Birkeland, OE Bøe and PJ Wisth

Department of Orthodontics and Facial Orthopedics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway

The aims of this study were to assess the relationship between occlusion, satisfaction with dental appearance, and self-esteem at the ages of 11 (T1) and 15 years (T2), and to study perceived treatment effects. Separate questionnaires were completed by children and their parents to determine their attitude. The dental casts of 224 children were collected at T1 and T2, and assessed by the Aesthetic Component (AC) and Dental Health Component (DHC) of the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN), and Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) Index.

At T2, 16 children had been treated with removable and 51 with fixed appliances, while 157 were untreated. The children in the fixed appliance group had better dental aesthetics (AC) and occlusion (DHC) than those in the two other groups. Average PAR score reduction was 71.6 per cent (T1-T2) and satisfaction with own or child's dental appearance increased significantly. The untreated group showed increased malocclusions. In spite of that, the children expressed higher satisfaction with their own dental appearance at T2 than at T1, while the parents' satisfaction level was unchanged. For the total group, orthodontic concern at T1, AC at T2, and gender accounted for 18.0 per cent of the variation in the children's satisfaction with their own dental appearance. Parents' concern at T1 and AC at T2 accounted for 32.2 per cent of the variation in parents' satisfaction. Improvement in self-esteem from 11 to 15 years was not correlated with treatment changes. A gender difference was found. The answers to the questionnaire indicated that both children and parents rate pleasant aesthetics as an important factor for psychosocial well being.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Dent. Res.Home page
J. Oh, C.J. Wang, M. Poole, E. Kim, R.C. Davis, I. Nishimura, and E.-K. Pae
A Genome Segment on Mouse Chromosome 12 Determines Maxillary Growth
J. Dent. Res., December 1, 2007; 86(12): 1203 - 1206.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the American Dental AssociationHome page
J. D. SHULMAN, G. MAUPOME, D. C. CLARK, and S. M. LEVY
Perceptions of desirable tooth color among parents, dentists and children
J Am Dent Assoc, May 1, 2004; 135(5): 595 - 604.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Orthod.Home page
C. R. Mattick, P. H. Gordon, and T. J. Gillgrass
Smile aesthetics and malocclusion in UK teenage magazines assessed using the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN)
J. Orthod., March 1, 2004; 31(1): 17 - 19.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.