Skip Navigation

The European Journal of Orthodontics 1997 19(3):271-277; doi:10.1093/ejo/19.3.271
© 1997 by European Orthodontic Society
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stenvik, A
Right arrow Articles by Linge, L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stenvik, A
Right arrow Articles by Linge, L
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Lay attitudes to dental appearance and need for orthodontic treatment

A Stenvik, L Espeland, BO Linge and L Linge

Department of Orthodontics, University of Oslo, Norway

In provision of advice about aesthetic treatment need, visual stimuli as a tool in communication may have some advantages compared with verbal descriptions, in particular when children are addressed. The Aesthetic Component (AC) of the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need is an illustrated scale for rating of dental attractiveness developed in the UK and based on lay adults' ratings of dental photographs. This scale has also been recommended for use in patient education. The purpose of the present study was to establish a sociocultural standard of reference for Norway related to the AC, in order to examine the applicability of the scale as a tool in patient information.

Samples of 137 children, 126 of their parents and 98 young adults were shown the 10 photographs comprising the AC. The subjects were asked to assess the photographs for dental attractiveness and orthodontic treatment need on a four-category rating scale. The findings indicated that, in general, photographs with an increasing scalepoint were rated as increasingly more unattractive. The majority (80-100 per cent) of the parents and young adults rated the five photographs on the unattractive end of the scale to be in need of treatment. The children were significantly less critical in their aesthetic judgements.

Photographs representing borderline need, identified for these groups to be scale points 5 and 6, have a potential in guiding patients and parents in making informed decisions about aesthetic treatment need.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J OrthodHome page
Y. Ren, C. Boxum, and A. Sandham
Patients' perceptions, treatment need, and complexity of orthodontic re-treatment
Eur J Orthod, April 1, 2009; 31(2): 189 - 195.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J OrthodHome page
A. M. Hamdan, I. K. Al-Omari, and Z. B. Al-Bitar
Ranking dental aesthetics and thresholds of treatment need: a comparison between patients, parents, and dentists
Eur J Orthod, August 1, 2007; 29(4): 366 - 371.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Orthod.Home page
C. Flores-Mir, P. W. Major, and F. R. Salazar
Self-perceived orthodontic treatment need evaluated through 3 scales in a university population
J. Orthod., December 1, 2004; 31(4): 329 - 334.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Orthod.Home page
N. Ucuncu and E. Ertugay
The Use of the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN) in a School Population and Referred Population
J. Orthod., March 1, 2001; 28(1): 45 - 52.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.