Skip Navigation



The European Journal of Orthodontics Advance Access published online on September 11, 2009

The European Journal of Orthodontics, doi:10.1093/ejo/cjp080
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Halpern, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Rouleau, T.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Halpern, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Rouleau, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Orthodontic Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

The effect of air abrasion preparation on the shear bond strength of an orthodontic bracket bonded to enamel

Richard M. Halpern* and Tanya Rouleau**

* Department of Preventive Dental Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
** Department of Oral Medicine, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA

Address for correspondence Richard M. Halpern, Department of Preventive Dental Science, University of Manitoba, D341 Dental Building, 780 Bannatyne, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, R3E 0W2, E-mail: richard_halpern{at}hotmail.com


   Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the method of preparation of enamel which best retains a bonded orthodontic bracket against a shear force. Two hundred and twelve human lower premolars were randomly divided into four equal groups. Group 1 underwent no air abrasion, group 2 received treatment with 25 µm aluminium oxide particles, group 3 with 50 µm particles, and group 4 with 100 µm particles. All groups were treated with a self-etching primer before bonding of an orthodontic bracket. Each tooth was tested in a JJ Lloyd M30K® machine to determine the maximum shear force required to dislodge the bracket from the tooth.

A one-way analysis of variance test conducted at a 95 per cent confidence level (CL) demonstrated that there was a significant difference (P < 0.01) with respect to the four methods of preparation of the enamel surface. An unpaired t-test was then applied at a 95 per cent CL. There was no statistically significant difference between groups 1 and 2. There was, however, a statistically significant difference between groups 1 and 3 (P < 0.01), as well as between groups 1 and 4 (P < 0.01). In addition, there was significant difference found between groups 2 and 3 (P < 0.05), groups 2 and 4 (P < 0.01), and groups 3 and 4 (P < 0.05).


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.