Skip Navigation



The European Journal of Orthodontics Advance Access published online on September 3, 2009

The European Journal of Orthodontics, doi:10.1093/ejo/cjp079
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Oktay, H.
Right arrow Articles by Ulukaya, E.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Oktay, H.
Right arrow Articles by Ulukaya, E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Orthodontic Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Intermaxillary tooth size discrepancies among different malocclusion groups

Hüsamettin Oktay and Esengül Ulukaya

Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey

Address for correspondenceDr Hüsamettin Oktay, Ortodonti Anabilim Dali, Dis Hekimligi Fakültesi, Atatürk Üniversitesi, 25240 Erzurum, Turkey, E-mail: hoktay{at}atauni.edu.tr


   Abstract

The aims of this study were to identify possible gender-related differences in tooth size ratios, to determine whether there is a prevalence for intermaxillary tooth size discrepancies in any malocclusion group, and to detect the percentage of tooth size discrepancies outside 1 or 2 standard deviations (SDs) from Bolton's mean. The material comprised the models of 500 subjects (284 females and 216 male aged between 12 and 28 years). Five groups were formed: normal occlusion, Class I, Class II division 1, Class II division 2, and Class III, which had an equal number of subjects. Tooth size measurements were undertaken using an electronic measuring device. Overall, anterior, and posterior ratios were computed as described by Bolton. For statistical evaluation, analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD) tests were used.

A significant gender difference was found only for posterior ratio in all groups (P < 0.01). There was no significant difference among the malocclusion groups in anterior ratio, but the differences for overall and posterior ratios were significant (P < 0.05 and P < 0.001, respectively). A large number of subjects had discrepancies greater than 2 SD from Bolton's mean. In addition, the means and SDs in this investigation were found to be larger than those of Bolton. Intermaxillary tooth size ratios may vary in different malocclusion types and may, to some degree, contribute to the severity of a malocclusion.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.