Skip Navigation


The European Journal of Orthodontics Advance Access originally published online on June 12, 2009
The European Journal of Orthodontics 2009 31(6):578-583; doi:10.1093/ejo/cjp058
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
31/6/578    most recent
cjp058v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ramanathan, C.
Right arrow Articles by Hofman, Z.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ramanathan, C.
Right arrow Articles by Hofman, Z.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Orthodontic Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Root resorption during orthodontic tooth movements

C. Ramanathan and Z. Hofman

Department of Orthodontics, Faculty Hospital in Hradec Králové, Charles University in Prague, Czech Republic

Address for correspondence Dr Chaitra Ramanathan, No. 252, 1st N Block, 9th Cross, Rajajinagar, Bangalore 560010, Karnataka, India, E-mail: chaitra_ramanathan{at}yahoo.co.in


   Abstract

The aim of the study was to compare the extent of maxillary incisor root resorption during different orthodontic tooth movements using three different techniques, namely the basal intrusion arch, the three component arch, and levelling of the upper dental arch with the straightwire appliance. The radiographs of 49 subjects (20 males and 29 females) with a mean age of 14.5 years were taken at two time points: in groups 1 and 2 after the levelling phase and in group 3 immediately after placement of the archwire (T1) and in all groups after a period of 6 months (T2). The amount of root resorption of the central incisors was determined at T2. The average incisor resorption was different in the three groups, with group 2 (three component arch) showing greater resorption (0.46 mm) than groups 1 (basal arch) and 3 (straightwire) of 0.26 and 0.25 mm, respectively. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) demonstrated that differences in root resorption in the three groups were not significant. Wilcoxon paired test showed that the root resorption occurring between T1 and T2 in the three groups was not significant. There was also no significant difference among the rates of resorption in the three groups. Grouping the subjects on the basis of the extent of root resorption and the biomechanics used showed differences in the percentage of subjects with the least (<0.5 mm) and greatest (0.5–0.9 mm) amounts of root resorption between the three groups. This again showed that the technique of three component intrusion arch resulted in the greatest increase in root resorption.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.