Skip Navigation


The European Journal of Orthodontics Advance Access originally published online on November 21, 2008
The European Journal of Orthodontics 2008 30(6):654-660; doi:10.1093/ejo/cjn053
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
30/6/654    most recent
cjn053v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reicheneder, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Muessig, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Reicheneder, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Muessig, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Orthodontic Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Conventionally ligated versus self-ligating metal brackets—a comparative study

C. A. Reicheneder*, T. Gedrange**, S. Berrisch***, P. Proff*, U. Baumert*, A. Faltermeier* and D. Muessig****

* Department of Orthodontics, Regensburg University Medical Center
** Department of Orthodontics, Preventive and Pediatric Dentistry, Medical Center, Ernst Moritz Arndt University of Greifswald
*** Private Practice, Munich, Germany
**** Private Practice, Linz, Austria

Address for correspondence C. A. Reicheneder, Department of Orthodontics, Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauss-Allee, 93053 Regensburg, Germany, E-mail: claudia.reicheneder{at}gmx.net


   Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the frictional properties of four self-ligating metal brackets, Speed, Damon 2, In-Ovation, and Time, with those of three conventionally ligated metal brackets, Time, Victory Twin, and Discovery. The self-ligating Time bracket can also be used as a conventionally ligated bracket. Friction was tested 20 times for each bracket/wire combination using a Zwick testing machine with stainless steel wires in three different wire dimensions (0.017 x 0.025, 0.018 x 0.025, and 0.019 x 0.025 inches). All brackets had a 0.022 inch slot and the prescription of an upper first premolar. The data were statistically analysed with unsigned comparisons of all bracket/wire combinations using the Mann–Whitney U-test and the Games–Howell post hoc test.

The results showed almost all brackets to have the lowest frictional force with a wire dimension of 0.018 x 0.025 inch. Friction of the self-ligating brackets using wire with a dimension of 0.018 x 0.025 inches was 45–48 per cent lower than with 0.017 x 0.025 and 0.019 x 0.025 inch wires. Friction of the conventionally ligated brackets showed a 14 per cent or less reduced friction with 0.018 x 0.025 inch wire compared with 0.017 x 0.025 and 0.019 x 0.025 inch wires. The self-ligating metal brackets showed lower frictional forces with a 0.018 x 0.025 inch wire than conventionally ligated brackets, whereas conventionally ligated brackets showed lower friction with 0.017 x 0.025 and 0.019 x 0.025 inch wire.

Friction values vary with different bracket/archwire combinations and, therefore, the choice of a bracket system for treatment should consider the correct wire dimension to produce the lowest possible frictional forces.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.