Skip Navigation


The European Journal of Orthodontics Advance Access originally published online on September 15, 2008
The European Journal of Orthodontics 2008 30(5):449-468; doi:10.1093/ejo/cjn048
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
30/5/449    most recent
cjn048v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van der Linden, F. P.G.M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van der Linden, F. P.G.M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Orthodontic Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Sheldon Friel Memorial Lecture 2007

Myths and Legends in Orthodontics*

Frans P.G.M. van der Linden

Radboud University Nymegen, Netherlands

Address for correspondence Frans P.G.M. van der Linden, Pauluslaan 15, NL-6564 AP Heilig Landstichting, The Netherlands, E-mail address: fransvanderlinden{at}planet.nl


   Abstract

Opinions and procedures, which are incorrect or invalid but continue to exist, are discussed. Eight seldomly criticised subjects have been selected which are relevant for the theory and practice of orthodontics. First, the idea that all individuals have or can reach an occlusion with contact between all opposing teeth is commented upon. Second, interest and preferences of editors and referees in the acceptance of manuscripts is clarified and the neglecting of published information explained. Third, the reliability of conclusions drawn from lateral roentgenocephalograms is reviewed in regard of the accuracy of commonly used bony landmarks. Fourth, the interpretation of growth data concerning visual interpretation, error of the method and reliability of conclusions based on cephalometric data, is treated. Fifth, the need of lateral roentgenocephalograms and recently developed digital techniques for diagnostic purposes is evaluated. Sixth, the validity of facial orthopedics, and particularly its supposed contribution to the improvement of facial configuration and beauty is analysed. Seventh, the idea that the increase of mandibular intercanine width is the cause of the occurrence of mandibular incisor irregularities after alignment by treatment is challenged. Eight, the usefulness of traditional removable retainers as the Hawley and "wrap-around" appliance, is questioned and an approach and design, adapted to the change from banding to bonding of fixed appliances, is presented.


* This paper is published as submitted without being subject to refereeing or editorial correction. The article does not comply with the formatting of the European Journal of Orthodontics.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.