Skip Navigation

The European Journal of Orthodontics 2008 30(3):249-253; doi:10.1093/ejo/cjm123
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kjær, I.
Right arrow Articles by Skovgaard, L. T.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kjær, I.
Right arrow Articles by Skovgaard, L. T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Orthodontic Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Can persistence of primary molars be predicted in subjects with multiple tooth agenesis?

Inger Kjær*, Michael Hald Nielsen* and Lene Theil Skovgaard**

* Department of Orthodontics
** Department of Biostatistics, University of Copenhagen, Denmark

Address for correspondence Professor Inger Kjær, Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 20 Nørre Alle, DK-2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark, E-mail: ik{at}odont.ku.dk


   Abstract

The purpose of this research was to create a method for predicting the persistence of primary molars in patients with multiple agenesis. Dental pantomographs (DPTs) from 51 males with agenesis of 5–17 teeth and 54 females with agenesis of 5–21 teeth were investigated. All patients (6 years 9 months to 16 years 7 months) had agenesis of one or both lower second premolars. Patients with ectodermal dysplasia and craniofacial anomalies were not included. The DPTs were classified into two groups according to tooth morphology and agenesis pattern.

Group I—ectodermal symptoms: screwdriver-shaped maxillary central incisors, invaginations in incisors or narrow incisors, taurodontic molar roots, and atypical agenesis. At least two of these ectodermal symptoms had to be present for classification into group I.

Group II: one or none of the criteria for group I.

Each group was subdivided according to the number of missing teeth. The degree of root resorption of the lower second primary molar was analysed and converted to a metric scale for statistical analysis. Ectodermal status (group I versus group II) was analysed as a binary outcome with agenesis and gender as covariates (logistic regression), whereas ordinary multiple regression was performed in order to study the dependency of root resorption score on gender, ectodermal status, and age.

The study showed that subjects with agenesis of more than seven teeth belonged more often to group I than group II, also when correcting for age differences. Root resorption of the primary molars was more severe in group I than in group II.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.