Skip Navigation

The European Journal of Orthodontics 2008 30(1):10-15; doi:10.1093/ejo/cjm098
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baek, S.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Chang, Y.-I.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Baek, S.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Chang, Y.-I.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Orthodontic Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Initial effect of multiloop edgewise archwire on the mandibular dentition in Class III malocclusion subjects. A three-dimensional finite element study

Seung-Hak Baek, Soo-Jung Shin, Sug-Joon Ahn and Young-Il Chang

Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University, South Korea

Address for correspondenceYoung-Il Chang, Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University, Yeonkun-dong #28, Jongro-kuSeoul 110-768, South Korea, E-mail: drwhite{at}snu.ac.kr


   Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of a multiloop edgewise archwire (MEAW) with a plain ideal archwire (IA) on distal en masse movement of the mandibular dentition. A three-dimensional finite element model (3D fem) of the mandibular dentition, without third permanent molars, was constructed to include the periodontal membrane (pdm), alveolar bone, standard edgewise bracket (0.018 x 0.025 inch), stainless steel IA (0.016 x 0.022 inch), and MEAW (0.016 x 0.022 inch). Stress distribution and displacement of the mandibular dentition were analyzed when Class III intermaxillary elastics (300 g/side) and 5 degree tip-back bends from the first premolar to the second molar were applied to the IA and the MEAW for distal en masse movement of the mandibular dentition.

Compared with the IA, the discrepancy in the amount of tooth displacement was less and individual tooth movement with the MEAW was more uniform and balanced. There was minimal vertical displacement or rotation of the teeth with the MEAW when compared with the IA. The MEAW seems to have advantages for distal en masse movement of the mandibular dentition.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.