Skip Navigation

The European Journal of Orthodontics 2007 29(Supplement 1):i128-i134; doi:10.1093/ejo/cjl079
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zachrisson, B. U.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Zachrisson, B. U.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© European Orthodontic Society. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Orthodontic Society.

Direct bonding in orthodontic treatment and retention a post-treatment evaluation

Bjorn U. Zachrisson

Oslo, Norway
(Transactions of the European Orthodontic Society 1976, pp. 291–301)


   Abstract

A post-treatment evaluation, after 9-20 months of routine orthodontic therapy, was made on the effectiveness of direct bonding with a chemically polymerized diluted composite material. A total of 612 brackets and buccal tubes on perforated metal backings were bonded to different teeth of 75 patients, including 237 incisors, 125 canines, 164 premolars and 86 first or second molars. To improve aesthetics, oral hygiene and gingival condition, slim bracket bases were used on all teeth and care was taken to use minute quantities of adhesive material. The same investigator bonded all the brackets and performed the orthodontic treatment.

The results demonstrated an overall failure rate of 11 per cent for the whole treatment period. The brackets most prone to come loose were the maxillary first molars (27%), followed by the mandibular first (24%) and second (18%) molars. The failure rates on all other teeth were lower than 10 per cent, with the canines giving the lowest debonding rates (4-6%). An evident individual variation was noted, and a few patients had a high number of failures. Clinical and scanning electron microscopic studies of tooth surfaces following removal of the brackets demonstrated a ‘normal’ surface appearance when plain-cut tungsten-carbide burs rotated at low speed were used to remove composite material that could not be scraped off, while fine diamonds and even sand paper discs created marked surface scratching.

It is concluded that carefully performed bonding techniques may be of value, particularly on anterior teeth, premolars and mandibular second molars, while the evidence at hand would suggest that first molars are better banded. Also, for retention purposes, direct bonding with composite material opens up a range of new possibilities, which seem to be very promising.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.