The European Journal of Orthodontics Advance Access originally published online on September 18, 2007
The European Journal of Orthodontics 2007 29(6):614-621; doi:10.1093/ejo/cjm066
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Success rate and efficiency of activator treatment
* Private practice, Illanz, Switzerland
** Department of Orthodontics, University of Giessen, Germany
*** Private practice, Giessen, Germany
Address for correspondence Professor Sabine Ruf, Department of Orthodontics, University of Giessen, Schlangenzahl 14, D-35392 Giessen, Germany, E-mail: sabine.ruf{at}dentist.med.uni-giessen.de
 |
Abstract |
|---|
In a retrospective multicentre study, the success rate and efficiency of activator treatment were analysed. All patients from two University clinics (Giessen, Germany and Berne, Switzerland) that fulfilled the selection criteria (Class II division 1 malocclusion, activator treatment, no aplasia, no extraction of permanent teeth, no syndromes, no previous orthodontic treatment except transverse maxillary expansion, full available records) were included in the study. The subject material amounted to 222 patients with a mean age of 10.6 years. Patient records, lateral head films, and dental casts were evaluated. Treatment was classified as successful if the molar relationship improved by at least half to three-fourths cusp width depending on whether or not the leeway space was used during treatment. Group comparisons were carried out using Wilcoxon two-sample and Kruskal–Wallis tests. For discrete data, chi-square analysis was used and Fisher's exact test when the sample size was small. Stepwise logistic regression was also employed.
The success rate was 64 per cent in Giessen and 66 per cent in Berne. The only factor that significantly (P < 0.001) influenced treatment success was the level of co-operation. In approximately 27 per cent of the patients at both centres, the post-treatment occlusion was an ‘ideal’ Class I. In an additional 38 per cent of the patients, marked improvements in occlusal relationships were found.
In subjects with Class II division 1 malocclusions, in which orthodontic treatment is performed by means of activators, a marked improvement of the Class II dental arch relationships can be expected in approximately 65 per cent of subjects. Activator treatment is more efficient in the late than in the early mixed dentition.