Skip Navigation

The European Journal of Orthodontics 2007 29(5):517-522; doi:10.1093/ejo/cjm044
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Asquith, J.
Right arrow Articles by Mossey, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Asquith, J.
Right arrow Articles by Mossey, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Orthodontic Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Three-dimensional imaging of orthodontic models: a pilot study

Jennifer Asquith*, Toby Gillgrass* and Peter Mossey**

* Edinburgh Postgraduate Dental Institute, Scotland, UK
** University of Dundee Dental Hospital and School, Scotland, UK

Address for correspondence Professor Peter Mossey, University of Dundee Dental Hospital and School, 1 Park Place, Dundee DD1 4HR, UK, E-mail: p.a.mossey{at}dundee.ac.uk


   Abstract

Computer-based digital orthodontic models have been developed that have the potential to replace dental casts. The aim of this study was to examine the accuracy and reproducibility of measurements made on digital models. Ten sets of orthodontic study models were scanned using the Arius3D Foundation System and three-dimensional (3D) images were produced by computer software. Two examiners individually measured 11 parameters on the conventional casts and the digital models on two occasions. The parameters included mesio-distal crown diameter, intercanine and intermolar width, arch length, overjet, and incisor crown height. The measurement techniques were compared using paired t-tests, the coefficient of reliability, and by calculating mean values and the difference between methods.

When comparing measurements made on digital models with those on dental casts, systematic errors were detected for five of the 11 parameters at the 10 per cent level. Random errors were a cause of concern for measurements of three parameters. The most accurate and reproducible measurements were lower intercanine width (mean difference between measurements 0.05 ± 0.32 mm) and overjet (mean difference 0.07 ± 0.33 mm). Most parameters on the digital models can be reliably measured, and digital models can potentially eliminate the requirement for the production and storage of dental casts, but this will depend on cost.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.