Skip Navigation


The European Journal of Orthodontics Advance Access originally published online on May 19, 2007
The European Journal of Orthodontics 2007 29(4):413-416; doi:10.1093/ejo/cjm024
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
29/4/413    most recent
cjm024v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bondevik, O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bondevik, O.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Orthodontic Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Differences between high- and low-angle subjects in arch form and anterior crowding from 23 to 33 years of age

Olav Bondevik

Department of Orthodontics, University of Oslo, Norway

Address for correspondence, Dr O. Bondevik, Department of Orthodontics, Dental Faculty, University of Oslo, Geitmyrsvn. 71, N-0137 Oslo, Norway, E-mail: olavb{at}odont.uio.no


   Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare changes in arch width and length in high- and low-angle subjects. The material comprised the cephalograms and study models of 17 males and 15 females with a high-angle and 12 males and 16 low-angle females. The age of the subjects at the first examination (T1) was 22 years 10 months and 22 years 8 months in the high-angle groups, 22 years 5 months and 22 years 8 months in the low-angle subjects, respectively, for males and females. The second assessment (T2) was 10 years and 9 years 10 months later in the high-angle and, 10 years 3 months and 9 years 10 months in the low-angle groups, respectively. Statistical analysis of changes for each group during the observation period T1–T2 was undertaken using a paired t-test, and the differences between the groups with two-sample t-tests.

The findings showed a general reduction in upper and lower arch length, an increase of intermolar width, and a decrease of intercanine width in both genders. Anterior perimeter and anterior space in both angles decreased in both males and females. The mean changes were small, but with large individual differences. There were no significant differences between the genders or the high- and low-angle groups in the changes, except that the female high-angle group had a statistically significant (P = 0.05) greater decrease in mandibular arch length than the low-angle female group.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J OrthodHome page
M. Lerstol, O. Torget, and V. Vandevska-Radunovic
Long-term stability of dentoalveolar and skeletal changes after activator-headgear treatment
Eur J Orthod, May 28, 2009; (2009) cjp042v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.