Skip Navigation

The European Journal of Orthodontics 2007 29(1):95-99; doi:10.1093/ejo/cjl060
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kiekens, R.
Right arrow Articles by Maltha, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kiekens, R.
Right arrow Articles by Maltha, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Orthodontic Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Influence of panel composition on aesthetic evaluation of adolescent faces

RMA Kiekens*, MA van 't Hof**, H Straatman***, Anne M. Kuijpers-Jagtman* and JC Maltha*

* Department of Orthodontics and Oral Biology
** Department of Preventive and Curative Dentistry
*** Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, The Netherlands

Address for correspondence Professor Anne M. Kuijpers-Jagtman, Department of Orthodontics and Oral Biology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, 309 Tandheelkunde, Postbus 9101, NL 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands, E-mail: a.kuijpers-jagtman{at}dent.umcn.nl


   Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of professional background, age, gender, and geographical region of panel members on their evaluation of the facial aesthetics of adolescents, and to assess the optimal panel size for epidemiological studies on facial aesthetics.

A panel of 76 adult laymen from two different regions (Belgium and The Netherlands) and a panel of 89 orthodontists from the same two regions, evaluated photographic sets (one frontal, one three-quarter smiling, and one lateral view) of 64 adolescents (32 boys, 32 girls) on a visual analogue scale (VAS) in relation to a reference set of photographs. The effects of the characteristics of the panel members on the VAS scores for boys and girls separately, as well as their interactions, were evaluated by multilevel models. The adolescents entered the model as a random effect and four characteristics of the panel members were included in the model as fixed effects.

The multilevel model with main effects and first-order interactions revealed that laymen rated adolescents as more attractive than orthodontists. This finding was significant for all laymen, except for older males, and Belgian laymen, when rating girls. Older panel members rated boys significantly more attractive than younger panel members. Males rated adolescents more attractive than females. The latter was significant for all male subgroups, except for the lay male subgroup. There were regional differences.

Based on the intraclass correlation coefficient, a panel of seven randomly selected laymen and/or orthodontists is sufficient to obtain reliable results in the aesthetic evaluation of adolescent faces, using photographs and a VAS.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J OrthodHome page
R. M. A. Kiekens, J. C. Maltha, M. A. van 't Hof, H. Straatman, and A. M. Kuijpers-Jagtman
Panel perception of change in facial aesthetics following orthodontic treatment in adolescents
Eur J Orthod, April 1, 2008; 30(2): 141 - 146.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.