Skip Navigation


The European Journal of Orthodontics Advance Access originally published online on August 31, 2005
The European Journal of Orthodontics 2005 27(5):484-488; doi:10.1093/ejo/cji032
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
27/5/484    most recent
cji032v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Malkoc, S.
Right arrow Articles by Ozer, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Malkoc, S.
Right arrow Articles by Ozer, F.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Orthodontics Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

The effect on shear bond strength of different antimicrobial agents after acid etching

Siddik Malkoc*, Abdullah Demir*, Abdulkadir Sengun** and Fusun Ozer**

Departments of * Orthodontics and ** Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey

Address for correspondence Siddik Malkoc, Selcuk Universitesi, Dishekimligi Fakultesi, Ortodonti A.D. Kampus, 42079 Konya, Turkey. E-mail: siddikmalkoc{at}yahoo.com

The aim of the present study was to determine whether the application of different primers containing antibacterial agents (Micro PrimeTM, Seal&ProtectTM, and Gluma DesensitizerTM) can affect the shear bond strength (SBS) of an orthodontic resin composite.

Seventy-two crowns of extracted lower human incisors were mounted in acrylic resin leaving the buccal surface of the crowns parallel to the base of the moulds. The teeth were randomly distributed into three experimental and one control group, each containing 18 teeth. In each experimental group, the primers were applied to the etched enamel surfaces. In the control group, no antibacterial primer was used. An orthodontic composite resin was applied to the surface into cylindrical-shaped plastic matrices after application of an orthodontic adhesive primer (Transbond XT). For shear bond testing, a stubby-shaped force transducer apparatus (Ultradent) was applied at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/minute to each specimen at the interface between the tooth and the composite until failure occurred. A Kruskal–Wallis one-way ANOVA and a Mann–Whitney U-test with a Bonferroni adjustment were used for statistical analysis.

There was no significant difference between Seal&ProtectTM (27.98 ± 8.73 MPa) and the control (35.15 ± 7.85 MPa) (P > 0.05). However, GlumaTM (21.61 ± 7.96 MPa) and Micro PrimeTM (14.89 ± 5.55 MPa) caused a decrease in bond strength (P < 0.05). No statistically significant difference was observed between Seal&ProtectTM and GlumaTM (P > 0.05).

As triclosan containing Seal&ProtectTM did not cause a significant decrease in bond strength, it can potentially be used under an orthodontic resin composite to obtain an antibacterial effect. However, further in vivo studies are required.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Eur J OrthodHome page
B. Ozturk, S. Malkoc, A. E. Koyuturk, B. Catalbas, and F. Ozer
Influence of different tooth types on the bond strength of two orthodontic adhesive systems
Eur J Orthod, August 1, 2008; 30(4): 407 - 412.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.