© 2001 by European Orthodontic Society
Orthodontic side-effects of mandibular advancement devices during treatment of snoring and sleep apnoea
1 Departments of Orthodontics, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden 2 Respiratory Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
The aims of this study were to investigate possible orthodontic side-effects following the use of mandibular advancement devices (MAD) in adults with snoring and sleep apnoea. A second objective was to analyse the effect of the appliance design. Seventy-five patients treated with MAD and 17 reference patients were studied at follow-up after 2.5 ± 0.5 years. In the test group, 47 patients were provided with soft elastomeric devices, while the remaining 28 patients received hard acrylic devices.
The treatment induced a change in overjet of –0.4 ± 0.8 mm (mean ± SD) and a change in overbite of –0.4 ± 0.7 mm (mean ’ SD). These changes were larger than those found in the reference group (P < 0.01). The odds ratio (OR) for the largest quartile of reduction in overjet was 3.8 in patients using hard acrylic devices compared with those using soft elastomeric devices (P < 0.05). A large reduction in overjet in patients using the hard acrylic devices was unrelated to the degree of mandibular protrusion by the device. The OR for a large reduction in overjet in patients using the soft elastomeric devices with a protrusion of 6 mm or above was 6.8 compared with smaller mandibular protrusions (P < 0.05).
The results indicate that the orthodontic side-effects are small during the treatment of adult subjects with MAD for snoring and sleep apnoea, especially in patients using soft elastomeric devices with mandibular protrusions of less than 6 mm. The follow-up of patients treated with MAD is recommended, as individual patients may experience marked orthodontic side-effects.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  K. R. MAGLIOCCA and J. I. HELMAN Obstructive sleep apnea: Diagnosis, medical management and dental implications J Am Dent Assoc, August 1, 2005; 136(8): 1121 - 1129. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. M. Smith and J. M. Battagel Non-apneic snoring and the orthodontist: the effectiveness of mandibular advancement splints J. Orthod., June 1, 2004; 31(2): 115 - 123. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Hoekema, B. Stegenga, and L.G.M. de Bont EFFICACY AND CO-MORBIDITY OF ORAL APPLIANCES IN THE TREATMENT OF OBSTRUCTIVE SLEEP APNEA-HYPOPNEA: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW Critical Reviews in Oral Biology & Medicine, May 1, 2004; 15(3): 137 - 155. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Marklund, H. Stenlund, and K. A. Franklin Mandibular Advancement Devices in 630 Men and Women With Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Snoring: Tolerability and Predictors of Treatment Success Chest, April 1, 2004; 125(4): 1270 - 1278. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. C. Rose, R. Staats, C. Virchow Jr, and I. E. Jonas Occlusal and Skeletal Effects of an Oral Appliance in the Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea* Chest, September 1, 2002; 122(3): 871 - 877. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|