Skip Navigation

The European Journal of Orthodontics 1997 19(5):511-515; doi:10.1093/ejo/19.5.511
© 1997 by European Orthodontic Society
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pearson, M.
Right arrow Articles by Zaki, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pearson, M.
Right arrow Articles by Zaki, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Management of palatally impacted canines: the findings of a collaborative study

MH PearsonA1, SN Robinson, R ReedA2, DJ Birnie and GA Zaki

Maxillofacial Unit, Queen Alexandra NHS Trust Hospital, Portsmouth, UK A1 Royal Naval Hospital Haslar, Gosport, UK A2 North Hampshire NHS Trust Hospital, Basingstoke, UK

The impacted palatal canine requires a combination of both surgical and orthodontic management. Two types of approach are commonly used: simple exposure, or exposure with bracketing at the time of surgery. In this study 104 consecutively treated patients with palatally impacted canines were examined at two centres, one at which the ectopic tooth was surgically exposed alone and the other where an orthodontic bracket was bonded to facilitate early traction, and the flap replaced. The aim was to compare the outcome and complication rate for each type of procedure.

In 30.7 per cent of all cases exposed and bracketed a second surgical intervention was required, compared with 15.3 per cent in the simple exposure group. Bracketing, though effective, is a more costly and time-consuming procedure, and it is suggested that simple exposure provides an equally efficient and predictable method of managing the palatally impacted canine with obvious clinical and financial benefits. The long-term periodontal status of the teeth which have been exposed in these two ways, however, needs further investigation.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.