Skip Navigation

The European Journal of Orthodontics 1996 18(1):41-54; doi:10.1093/ejo/18.1.41
© 1996 by European Orthodontic Society
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Battagel, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Battagel, J. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

The use of tensor analysis to investigate facial changes in treated Class II division 1 malocclusions

Joanna M. Battagel

Department of Child Dental Health, London Hospital Medical College Dental School London, UK

Address for correspondence Dr Joanna M. Battagel, Department of Child Dental Health, London Hospital Medical College Dental School, Stepney Way, London E1 2AD, United Kingdom

This retrospective cephalometric study examined the facial changes brought about by treatment in 62 Class II division 1 children, using tensor analysis. Thirty-two children were treated with Frankel appliances, whilst the remaining 30 received premolar extractions, headgear, and conventional Edgewise mechanics. Each child was matched for age and sex with an untreated individual in whom the occlusion was deemed satisfactory and the treatment changes were compared with those expected during normal development.

Results indicated that vertical facial development predominated in both treated groups: this exceeded the increase expected in an untreated population. The Frankel group exhibited the greater gain in lower face height, with changes confined almost entirely to the mandible. Effective mandibular position improved but there was no increase in body length. The incisors were more favourably positioned within the face with similar improvements in the soft tissues. Thus, although facial balance was better following a non-extraction Frankel approach, control of the vertical dimension was inadequate.

The fixed appliance group exhibited a smaller increase in lower facial height and no favourable mandibular development: maxillary retraction was the most striking skeletal alteration.

By removing the traditional, fixed, superimpositional framework of the cranial base, tensor analysis highlights vertical and mandibular changes not easily detected by conventional cephalometry.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.