Skip Navigation

The European Journal of Orthodontics 1995 17(6):497-503; doi:10.1093/ejo/17.6.497
© 1995 by European Orthodontic Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pahkala, R.
Right arrow Articles by Närhi, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pahkala, R.
Right arrow Articles by Närhi, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Associations among different orofacial dysfunctions in 9–11-year-olds

R. Pahkala, T. Laine* and M. Närhi**

*Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry Finland
**Department of Physiology, University of Kuopio Finland

Address for correspondence Riitta Pahkala Department of Orthodontics Faculty of Dentistry University of Kuopio P.O. Box-1627, 70211 Kuopio Finland

This study is the second part of a longitudinal investigation on different orofacial dysfunctions in growing individuals. The aim of the present report was to determine, in 219 children with and without articulatory speech disorders, whether certain associations among misarticulations of speech, craniomandibular disorders (CMD), and problems in oral motor skills still were found at the age of 9–11 years, as they had been in these children at the age of 6–8 years.

Multiple logistic regression models showed that certain aspects of dental malocclusion such as large overjet, anterior open bite and lateral cross-bite, and certain signs of CMD such as paIpatory tenderness of the TMJ, jaw deviation on opening and bruxism were related to misarticulations of speech. Children with sounds produced too far posteriorly seemed to have a smaller maximal opening but larger laterotrusive and protrusive movement capacities of the mandible than children with correct speech articulation. Despite maturation of the oral motor skills with age, among 9–11-year-olds various orofacial dysfunctions still seemed to be associated with each other. This probably indicates fixation of certain speech misarticulations rather than immaturity of the fine motor control.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.