Skip Navigation

The European Journal of Orthodontics 1989 11(3):290-297;
© 1989 by European Orthodontic Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lundström, A.
Right arrow Articles by Woodside, D. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lundström, A.
Right arrow Articles by Woodside, D. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Panel assessments of the facial frontal view as related to mandibular growth direction

A. Lundström, F. Popovich and D. G. Woodside

Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge Sweden Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto Canada

Professor A Lundström, Angantyrv 28, S-18264 Djursholm, Sweden

This paper describes study No. 6 in a series dealing with mandibular growth direction (Lundström and Woodside, 1980). Study No. 5. (Lundström, Woodside and Popovich 1987) investigated facial harmony and disharmony of the facial profile. The present paper describes a study of the frontal views of the same children as paper No. 5.

A mixed panel of 17 individuals (four categories of three, four and six people in each) made an aesthetic evaluation of the frontal facial view of 64 subjects (32 of each sex) from the Burlington serial experimental group. The sample consisted of equal numbers of individuals who displayed vertical, average or horizontal mandibular growth between the ages 6–20 years. We calculated correlations between the four assessor groups and found these to be acceptable. On average the panel found no change in frontal appearance between 12 and 18 years because of the balance between individuals improving and deteriorating. Our earlier work showed systematic differences in profile view between those with vertical growth on the one hand and average or horizontal on the other. The vertical cases were more disharmonious than the other categories. Corresponding findings were made also in the frontal view. Mean overall evaluations by all assessors showed a positive correlation between profile and front view assessments.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.