© 1989 by European Orthodontic Society
Occupational health problems and adverse patient reactions in orthodontics
Haslum, Norway
Dr Nils Jacobsen, Nordisk Instittutt for Odontologisk Materialprøvning, Postboks 70, N-1344, Haslum, Norway
The purpose of the present investigation was to study the nature and frequency of adverse reactions to materials and procedures among orthodontists and their patients.
A questionnaire about this topic was mailed to practicing members of the Norwegian Orthodontic Society, of which 137 (about 75%) responded together with 127 chairside assistants. About half of the orthodontic personnel had experienced adverse reactions. The majority of the problems were dermatoses, comprising dryness, redness, itching, thickening, reduced tactile sensitivity, fissuring, soreness/desquamation and pain of hands and fingers. The residual were respiratory reactions, eye reactions or reactions of a general nature.
Many of the dermatoses were of moderate severity, attributed to (seasonal) air/ventilation associated problems. Other frequent causes were hand washing procedures, work involving composites and acrylics (orthodontists), or work involving model materials, alcoholic disinfectants, latex gloves, alignates etc. (assistants). For both groups the most severe dermatological reactions were associated with unspecified allergies, acrylics and composites. Non-dermatological reactions also reflected the different working pattern and exposure to materials in orthodontics; acrylic monomer topping the list.
The orthodontists had observed 425 patients with dermal reactions and 67 patients with intraoral/systemic reactions, indicating a prevalence of about 1 per cent. Dermal reactions included redness, eczema, itching and fissuring in facial, neck or perioral areas, mostly attributed to metallic parts of extraoral appliances, with some exceptions (elastics, neck pillows, head caps). Intraoral reactions consisted of redness, soreness and swelling of the oral mucosa, gingiva and/or lips and were associated with metal brackets, labial wires, bonding procedures or acrylic appliances.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  C.-T. Kao, S.-J. Ding, Y. Min, T. C. Hsu, M.-Y. Chou, and T.-H. Huang The cytotoxicity of orthodontic metal bracket immersion media Eur J Orthod, April 1, 2007; 29(2): 198 - 203. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Vande Vannet, N. Mohebbian, and H. Wehrbein Toxicity of used orthodontic archwires assessed by three-dimensional cell culture Eur J Orthod, October 1, 2006; 28(5): 426 - 432. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E.C. Munksgaard Toxicology Versus Allergy in Restorative Dentistry Advances in Dental Research, September 1, 1992; 6(1): 17 - 21. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Hensten-Pettersen Casting Alloys: Side-Effects Advances in Dental Research, September 1, 1992; 6(1): 38 - 43. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. C. Bayne Dental Composites/Glass Ionomers: Clinical Reports Advances in Dental Research, September 1, 1992; 6(1): 65 - 77. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|