Skip Navigation

The European Journal of Orthodontics 1988 10(1):39-51; doi:10.1093/ejo/10.1.39
© 1988 by European Orthodontic Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stensland, A.
Right arrow Articles by Böe, O. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stensland, A.
Right arrow Articles by Böe, O. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Dentofacial changes in children with negative overjet treated by a combined orthodontic and orthopaedic approach

A. Stensland, P. J. Wisth1 and O. E. Böe

Department of Orthodontics and Facial Orthopaedics, University of Bergen Norway

1Professor Per Johan Wisth Department of Orthdontics and Facial Orthopedics School of Dentistry University of Bergen Årstadveien 17 N-5000 Bergen, Norway

The intention of this study was to investiga$$$e whether any morphologic characteristics found at an early age are helpful in prediction of a good or poor response to early treatment of Angle Class III malocciusions, and to study the dento-alveolar and basal effects of combined retractor and chin-cap therapy. The data were obtained from lateral cephalometric radiographs of 51 children taken before treatment at an age of 4 to 9 years, after a treatment period of 5–18 months and about one and a half years after treatment. A group of children with a normal maxillo-mandibular relationship and a positive overjet was used as a control group.

The pretreatment comparison revealed a more anterior position of the jaw angle, a more open angle, and a more acute chin prominence in the group that responded poorly to treatment. The differences between each of the two treatment groups and the control group were very similar.

The treatment changes were approximately the same in the two treatment groups, but changes in the group with the good treatment response were more like the changes in the control group than in the group with poor results. Also during the observation period the changes were very similar in the two groups, and without exception indicated a relapse towards Class III morphology. The positive overjet and overbite were maintained in the group with good treatment results. The study does not indicate whether it is possible to maintain the good result throughout the rest of the growth period, but obviously a correct anterior occlusion is favourable for dento-alveolar compensation of unfavourable skeletal change.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.